ActiveMQ vs Apache Pulsar

Struggling to choose between ActiveMQ and Apache Pulsar? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

ActiveMQ is a Development solution with tags like messaging, queues, topics, jms.

It boasts features such as Supports a variety of messaging protocols like AMQP, MQTT, OpenWire, REST, STOMP, WebSocket, High performance and scalability using advanced broker clustering, Flexible deployment options including standalone, embedded, and cloud, Message persistence for reliability and recoverability, Security through authentication and authorization, Web-based admin console for management and monitoring and pros including Open source and free, Highly scalable and performant, Supports many languages and platforms, Lots of advanced messaging features, Popular and widely adopted, Great community support.

On the other hand, Apache Pulsar is a Development product tagged with pubsub, messaging, distributed-systems, low-latency, durable-storage.

Its standout features include Multi-tenancy, Geo-replication, Automatic data partitioning, Tiered storage, Low publish latency, Guaranteed message delivery, Multiple subscription modes, and it shines with pros like High throughput, Low latency, Durable message storage, Flexible scalability, Multiple subscription modes.

Feature	ActiveMQ	Apache Pulsar
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

ActiveMQ

Description: ActiveMQ is an open source message broker that implements the Java Message Service (JMS) API for sending, receiving, and persisting messages between distributed applications. It supports many advanced messaging features like message queues, topic publishing and subscribing, reliability, and security.

Apache Pulsar

Description: Apache Pulsar is an open-source distributed pub-sub messaging system originally created by Yahoo and now under the Apache Software Foundation. It is horizontally scalable, provides low latency and durable storage for messages.

Key Features Comparison

ActiveMQ Features

• Supports a variety of messaging protocols like AMQP, MQTT, OpenWire, REST, STOMP, WebSocket
• High performance and scalability using advanced broker clustering
• Flexible deployment options including standalone, embedded, and cloud
• Message persistence for reliability and recoverability
• Security through authentication and authorization
• Web-based admin console for management and monitoring

Apache Pulsar Features

• Multi-tenancy
• Geo-replication
• Automatic data partitioning
• Tiered storage
• Low publish latency
• Guaranteed message delivery
• Multiple subscription modes

Pros & Cons Analysis

ActiveMQ

Pros

• Open source and free
• Highly scalable and performant
• Supports many languages and platforms
• Lots of advanced messaging features
• Popular and widely adopted
• Great community support

Cons

• Can have a steep learning curve
• Requires more resources than lighter-weight options
• Not as user friendly as some alternatives
• Lacks some very advanced features of proprietary options

Apache Pulsar

Pros

• High throughput
• Low latency
• Durable message storage
• Flexible scalability
• Multiple subscription modes

Cons

• Complex configuration
• Steep learning curve
• No built-in security features
• Limited monitoring and management tools

Pricing Comparison

ActiveMQ

• Open Source

Apache Pulsar

• Open Source