Acunetix vs OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

Struggling to choose between Acunetix and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Acunetix is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like web-security, vulnerability-scanning, web-application-security.

It boasts features such as Automated vulnerability scanning, Manual testing tools, Web crawler, Authentication testing, Advanced scanning options, Integrations, Reporting and pros including Comprehensive vulnerability scanning, Easy to use interface, Flexible authentication testing, Broad range of integrations, Detailed reports.

On the other hand, OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is a Security & Privacy product tagged with security, web-app-scanner, vulnerability-scanner, penetration-testing, owasp.

Its standout features include Spidering and crawling of web applications, Passive scanning for analysis of requests and responses, Active scanning for vulnerability detection, AJAX spidering for crawling of modern web apps, Variety of attack tools for penetration testing, Extensible via add-ons for advanced functions, Built-in proxy for traffic inspection and modification, Automated and manual testing options, Command line and GUI interfaces, Authentication tools for session management, Integrations with CI/CD pipelines, APIs for integration with other tools, Exporting of reports in various formats, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to use interface, Powerful scanning capabilities, Active community support and development, Cross-platform compatibility, Extensible and customizable via plugins, Integrates well with other tools, Helps identify a wide range of vulnerabilities.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Acunetix

Acunetix

Acunetix is a web application security scanning tool used to detect and report on vulnerabilities in websites and web apps. It can automatically scan code to identify SQL injection, XSS, and other vulnerabilities.

Categories:
web-security vulnerability-scanning web-application-security

Acunetix Features

  1. Automated vulnerability scanning
  2. Manual testing tools
  3. Web crawler
  4. Authentication testing
  5. Advanced scanning options
  6. Integrations
  7. Reporting

Pricing

  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Comprehensive vulnerability scanning

Easy to use interface

Flexible authentication testing

Broad range of integrations

Detailed reports

Cons

Expensive licensing

Limited support for APIs

Prone to false positives

Lacks customization options


OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

ZAP is an open-source web application security scanner used to find vulnerabilities in web apps. It offers automated and manual tools to scan APIs, access control weaknesses, injection flaws, XSS, and other issues.

Categories:
security web-app-scanner vulnerability-scanner penetration-testing owasp

OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) Features

  1. Spidering and crawling of web applications
  2. Passive scanning for analysis of requests and responses
  3. Active scanning for vulnerability detection
  4. AJAX spidering for crawling of modern web apps
  5. Variety of attack tools for penetration testing
  6. Extensible via add-ons for advanced functions
  7. Built-in proxy for traffic inspection and modification
  8. Automated and manual testing options
  9. Command line and GUI interfaces
  10. Authentication tools for session management
  11. Integrations with CI/CD pipelines
  12. APIs for integration with other tools
  13. Exporting of reports in various formats

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

Easy to use interface

Powerful scanning capabilities

Active community support and development

Cross-platform compatibility

Extensible and customizable via plugins

Integrates well with other tools

Helps identify a wide range of vulnerabilities

Cons

Can generate false positives

Limited default policies for authentication

Requires expertise to leverage advanced features

Not as feature rich as commercial products

Lacks official technical support services