Struggling to choose between Apache Cassandra and OrbitDB? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.
Apache Cassandra is a Databases solution with tags like distributed, scalable, high-availability, fault-tolerant, wide-column-store.
It boasts features such as Distributed database system, Linear scalability, Fault tolerance, Tunable consistency, Column-oriented database, Multi-datacenter replication and pros including High availability, Fast writes, Tunable consistency, Flexible schema design, Linear scalability.
On the other hand, OrbitDB is a Development product tagged with decentralized, peertopeer, ipfs, distributed-web.
Its standout features include Decentralized database, Built on IPFS, Event log for database changes, Supports CRUD operations, Access control lists, Queryable database API, and it shines with pros like Decentralization provides censorship resistance, Data is distributed across nodes, Immutable append-only log, Fine-grained access control, Interoperable with other IPFS tools.
To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.
Apache Cassandra is a free, open-source, distributed NoSQL database management system designed to handle large amounts of data across many commodity servers, providing high availability with no single point of failure.
OrbitDB is a decentralized peer-to-peer database that allows developers to build decentralized applications. It works on top of IPFS, providing an API for managing databases on the distributed web.