Appium vs TestComplete

Struggling to choose between Appium and TestComplete? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Appium is a Development solution with tags like automation, testing, mobile, selenium.

It boasts features such as Supports automation of native, hybrid and mobile web apps, Cross-platform - can test iOS and Android apps, Uses Selenium WebDriver API for automation, Supports multiple programming languages like Java, Python, JavaScript, Ruby, C# etc, Active open source community and frequent updates and pros including Open source and free to use, Large user and contributor community, Supports many platforms, languages and frameworks, Can reuse existing Selenium tests for mobile testing, Good documentation and active forums for support.

On the other hand, TestComplete is a Development product tagged with automated-testing, ui-testing, functional-testing, regression-testing, crossbrowser-testing, load-testing.

Its standout features include Record and playback functionality to create automated UI tests, Support for multiple testing frameworks like keyword-driven, data-driven, hybrid, Cross-browser testing on multiple browsers and browser versions, Mobile app testing on emulators and real devices, API testing with REST and SOAP protocols, Integration with CI/CD pipelines, Scripting in JavaScript, Python, VBScript, Object recognition using image-based object spy, Smart test generator to auto-generate test cases, and it shines with pros like No coding required to create tests, Wide range of supported technologies and frameworks, Good for both manual and automated testing, Detailed reporting and analytics, Active user community and documentation.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Appium

Appium

Appium is an open source test automation framework for mobile apps. It allows you to automate tests on native, hybrid and mobile web apps for iOS and Android using Selenium WebDriver API.

Categories:
automation testing mobile selenium

Appium Features

  1. Supports automation of native, hybrid and mobile web apps
  2. Cross-platform - can test iOS and Android apps
  3. Uses Selenium WebDriver API for automation
  4. Supports multiple programming languages like Java, Python, JavaScript, Ruby, C# etc
  5. Active open source community and frequent updates

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source and free to use

Large user and contributor community

Supports many platforms, languages and frameworks

Can reuse existing Selenium tests for mobile testing

Good documentation and active forums for support

Cons

Set up and configuration can be complex

Mobile testing is slower compared to web testing

Requires knowledge of mobile app architecture

Not ideal for games or complex UI testing

May not work well with very latest OS versions


TestComplete

TestComplete

TestComplete is an automated testing tool used by software testers and developers to test desktop, web, and mobile applications. It supports a range of testing methodologies and allows for creating automated UI tests without scripting.

Categories:
automated-testing ui-testing functional-testing regression-testing crossbrowser-testing load-testing

TestComplete Features

  1. Record and playback functionality to create automated UI tests
  2. Support for multiple testing frameworks like keyword-driven, data-driven, hybrid
  3. Cross-browser testing on multiple browsers and browser versions
  4. Mobile app testing on emulators and real devices
  5. API testing with REST and SOAP protocols
  6. Integration with CI/CD pipelines
  7. Scripting in JavaScript, Python, VBScript
  8. Object recognition using image-based object spy
  9. Smart test generator to auto-generate test cases

Pricing

  • Free Trial
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

No coding required to create tests

Wide range of supported technologies and frameworks

Good for both manual and automated testing

Detailed reporting and analytics

Active user community and documentation

Cons

Steep learning curve

Scripting requires programming knowledge

No built-in support for performance or security testing

Limited support options on lower pricing tiers