Artica vs Univention Corporate Server

Struggling to choose between Artica and Univention Corporate Server? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Artica is a Network & Admin solution with tags like monitoring, network, open-source.

It boasts features such as Network monitoring, Application monitoring, Availability monitoring, Performance monitoring, Bandwidth monitoring, Alerting and notifications, Customizable dashboards, Device discovery, Automated reporting and pros including Open source and free, Easy to install and configure, Intuitive web interface, Scalable for large environments, Supports many protocols and technologies, Customizable alerts and notifications, Good community support.

On the other hand, Univention Corporate Server is a Business & Commerce product tagged with linux, open-source, identity-management, infrastructure.

Its standout features include Centralized management of users, clients, servers, networks and services, Integrated identity management and authentication, Web-based administration interface, Support for virtualization and cloud platforms, Pre-configured services like file sharing, printing, VPN, mail, etc, Modular architecture allowing customization and extension, Built on Debian Linux and Samba 4, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Integrated solution for managing infrastructure, Easy to deploy and use, Scales from small business to large enterprises, Supports mixed environments with Linux, Windows, macOS, etc, Backed by Univention GmbH for support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Artica

Artica

Artica is an open-source network monitoring solution that provides visibility into networks and applications. It can monitor availability, performance, and bandwidth utilization across networks, servers, and applications.

Categories:
monitoring network open-source

Artica Features

  1. Network monitoring
  2. Application monitoring
  3. Availability monitoring
  4. Performance monitoring
  5. Bandwidth monitoring
  6. Alerting and notifications
  7. Customizable dashboards
  8. Device discovery
  9. Automated reporting

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free

Pros

Open source and free

Easy to install and configure

Intuitive web interface

Scalable for large environments

Supports many protocols and technologies

Customizable alerts and notifications

Good community support

Cons

Limited official documentation

Less features than commercial solutions

Basic reporting capabilities

No mobile app

Steep learning curve


Univention Corporate Server

Univention Corporate Server

Univention Corporate Server (UCS) is an open source enterprise Linux distribution designed for companies and organizations. It includes identity management, infrastructure services, administration tools and web interfaces for managing users, clients, servers, networks and services.

Categories:
linux open-source identity-management infrastructure

Univention Corporate Server Features

  1. Centralized management of users, clients, servers, networks and services
  2. Integrated identity management and authentication
  3. Web-based administration interface
  4. Support for virtualization and cloud platforms
  5. Pre-configured services like file sharing, printing, VPN, mail, etc
  6. Modular architecture allowing customization and extension
  7. Built on Debian Linux and Samba 4

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free
  • Custom Pricing

Pros

Open source and free

Integrated solution for managing infrastructure

Easy to deploy and use

Scales from small business to large enterprises

Supports mixed environments with Linux, Windows, macOS, etc

Backed by Univention GmbH for support

Cons

Limited adoption compared to proprietary solutions

Steeper learning curve than consumer-grade OSes

Requires expertise to customize and integrate with other systems

Lacks some features of proprietary competitors

Documentation and community support could be better