Automic Release Automation vs GoCD

Struggling to choose between Automic Release Automation and GoCD? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Automic Release Automation is a Business & Commerce solution with tags like release-management, deployment-automation, continuous-delivery.

It boasts features such as Automated deployment and release management, Continuous delivery with automated build, test, and deployment processes, Support for hybrid environments, Centralized control and visibility of release processes, Rollback and self-healing capabilities, Integration with various tools and platforms and pros including Streamlines and accelerates the release process, Reduces manual errors and increases reliability, Provides centralized control and visibility of releases, Supports hybrid environments and heterogeneous infrastructures, Offers rollback and self-healing capabilities for increased stability.

On the other hand, GoCD is a Development product tagged with automation, continuous-delivery, continuous-integration, deployment, release-management.

Its standout features include Automated build pipeline creation and management, Built-in support for common build tools like Maven, Gradle, Ant, Rake, SBT, MSBuild, Make, Exec, NAnt, Phing, etc, Parallel and sequential execution of tasks, Built-in artifact repository, Value stream map to visualize build workflow, Role based access control, Plugins for integration with other tools, and it shines with pros like Open source and free to use, Highly customizable and extensible via plugins, Good documentation and community support, Integrates well with other DevOps tools, Scales well for large codebases and teams.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Automic Release Automation

Automic Release Automation

Automic Release Automation is a software solution that provides automated deployments and release management. It supports continuous delivery by automating build, test, and deployment processes across hybrid environments.

Categories:
release-management deployment-automation continuous-delivery

Automic Release Automation Features

  1. Automated deployment and release management
  2. Continuous delivery with automated build, test, and deployment processes
  3. Support for hybrid environments
  4. Centralized control and visibility of release processes
  5. Rollback and self-healing capabilities
  6. Integration with various tools and platforms

Pricing

  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Streamlines and accelerates the release process

Reduces manual errors and increases reliability

Provides centralized control and visibility of releases

Supports hybrid environments and heterogeneous infrastructures

Offers rollback and self-healing capabilities for increased stability

Cons

Complex setup and configuration for larger enterprises

Steep learning curve for users unfamiliar with release automation

Potential integration challenges with existing tools and systems

Limited customization options for advanced use cases


GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server that helps automate the software release workflow. It provides visibility into builds, deployments, and testing environments to help teams release software faster and more reliably.

Categories:
automation continuous-delivery continuous-integration deployment release-management

GoCD Features

  1. Automated build pipeline creation and management
  2. Built-in support for common build tools like Maven, Gradle, Ant, Rake, SBT, MSBuild, Make, Exec, NAnt, Phing, etc
  3. Parallel and sequential execution of tasks
  4. Built-in artifact repository
  5. Value stream map to visualize build workflow
  6. Role based access control
  7. Plugins for integration with other tools

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source and free to use

Highly customizable and extensible via plugins

Good documentation and community support

Integrates well with other DevOps tools

Scales well for large codebases and teams

Cons

Steep learning curve

Setting up complex build pipelines can be tricky

Lacks some advanced features found in paid alternatives

Upgrades can be tricky due to breaking changes

Limited native support for Windows environments