Bitbucket vs Mergify

Struggling to choose between Bitbucket and Mergify? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Bitbucket is a Development solution with tags like git, mercurial, repository, version-control.

It boasts features such as Git and Mercurial version control, Pull requests for code review, Issue tracking, Code search, Wikis for documentation, Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc and pros including Unlimited private repositories for small teams, Great integration with other Atlassian products, Powerful branch permissions and workflows, Fast and reliable performance.

On the other hand, Mergify is a Development product tagged with github, automation, pull-requests.

Its standout features include Automated merging, closing, labeling and assigning of pull requests based on rules, Support for GitHub Actions and branch protection rules, Web interface to view and manage pull requests, Notifications through various channels like email, Slack etc, Integration with services like Travis CI, CircleCI, AppVeyor etc, Caching of pull requests to optimize performance, Support for GitHub Enterprise installations, Webhook support for external triggers, and it shines with pros like Saves time by automating repetitive pull request tasks, Improves team workflow and collaboration, Increases visibility into status of pull requests, Easy to set up and get started, Flexible rules system to customize automation, Free for open source projects.

Feature	Bitbucket	Mergify
Overall Score	1	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Bitbucket

Description: Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service owned by Atlassian that allows teams to collaborate on code. It provides tools to manage Git and Mercurial repositories, issue tracking, wikis, and more for teams of any size.

Mergify

Description: Mergify is an automation tool for managing pull requests on GitHub. It allows you to define rules to automatically merge, close, label, or assign pull requests based on conditions.

Key Features Comparison

Bitbucket Features

• Git and Mercurial version control
• Pull requests for code review
• Issue tracking
• Code search
• Wikis for documentation
• Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc

Mergify Features

• Automated merging, closing, labeling and assigning of pull requests based on rules
• Support for GitHub Actions and branch protection rules
• Web interface to view and manage pull requests
• Notifications through various channels like email, Slack etc
• Integration with services like Travis CI, CircleCI, AppVeyor etc
• Caching of pull requests to optimize performance
• Support for GitHub Enterprise installations
• Webhook support for external triggers

Pros & Cons Analysis

Bitbucket

Pros

• Unlimited private repositories for small teams
• Great integration with other Atlassian products
• Powerful branch permissions and workflows
• Fast and reliable performance

Cons

• Less repository storage than GitHub for free plan
• Missing some features of GitHub like social coding
• Web interface not as polished as GitHub

Mergify

Pros

• Saves time by automating repetitive pull request tasks
• Improves team workflow and collaboration
• Increases visibility into status of pull requests
• Easy to set up and get started
• Flexible rules system to customize automation
• Free for open source projects

Cons

• Can only be used for projects hosted on GitHub
• Rules can be complex to configure for advanced workflows
• No native mobile apps, only web interface
• Potential for incorrectly configured rules to cause problems
• Limited customization compared to self-hosted solutions

Pricing Comparison

Bitbucket

• Free
• Standard ($3-10 per user/month)
• Premium ($6-21 per user/month)

Mergify

• Free
• Freemium
• Open Source