Bodymovin vs FabricJS

Struggling to choose between Bodymovin and FabricJS? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Bodymovin is a Video & Movies solution with tags like after-effects, animation, html5, json.

It boasts features such as Exports After Effects animations as JSON data, Allows animations to be rendered in HTML5, Supports vector animations and shapes, Can export animations as SVG or canvas elements, Includes a player for rendering animations, Integrates with popular JS animation libraries like Lottie, Open source and free and pros including Lightweight method to render complex AE animations for web, Much smaller file sizes compared to video formats, Animations remain vector based for scaling, Easily integrate motion design into web projects, Good performance even on mobile devices, Active development and support.

On the other hand, FabricJS is a Development product tagged with canvas, graphics, animation, image-processing.

Its standout features include SVG-to-canvas parser, Interactive object selection, Object stacking, Object controls, Object animation, Canvas image filters, Canvas text support, Canvas serialization, and it shines with pros like Open source, Active community, Good documentation, Modular architecture, High performance, Cross-browser support, Rich set of features.

Feature	Bodymovin	FabricJS
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Video & Movies	Development

Product Overview

Bodymovin

Description: Bodymovin is an After Effects plugin that allows you to export After Effects animations to JSON data that can be used to recreate the animations in HTML5.

FabricJS

Description: FabricJS is a powerful and open-source JavaScript canvas library for working with HTML5 canvas elements. It makes it easy to work with advanced canvas functions like object selection, drag & drop, shape creation, animation, and image filters.

Key Features Comparison

Bodymovin Features

• Exports After Effects animations as JSON data
• Allows animations to be rendered in HTML5
• Supports vector animations and shapes
• Can export animations as SVG or canvas elements
• Includes a player for rendering animations
• Integrates with popular JS animation libraries like Lottie
• Open source and free

FabricJS Features

• SVG-to-canvas parser
• Interactive object selection
• Object stacking
• Object controls
• Object animation
• Canvas image filters
• Canvas text support
• Canvas serialization

Pros & Cons Analysis

Bodymovin

Pros

• Lightweight method to render complex AE animations for web
• Much smaller file sizes compared to video formats
• Animations remain vector based for scaling
• Easily integrate motion design into web projects
• Good performance even on mobile devices
• Active development and support

Cons

• Only exports what is supported by HTML5 canvas/SVG
• More limited than native AE project format
• Requires specific player library for rendering
• Less customizable compared to code-based web animations
• Limited browser support in some cases

FabricJS

Pros

• Open source
• Active community
• Good documentation
• Modular architecture
• High performance
• Cross-browser support
• Rich set of features

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Not optimized for mobile
• Limited IE support
• No React integration out of the box

Pricing Comparison

Bodymovin

• Open Source

FabricJS

• Open Source