bspwm vs i3

Struggling to choose between bspwm and i3? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

bspwm is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like tiling, keyboarddriven, lightweight, binary-space-partitioning, efficient-screen-space, external-configuration.

It boasts features such as Binary space partitioning window layout, Keyboard driven window management, Flexible rule-based configuration, Support for multi-monitor setups, Minimal resource usage and pros including Very efficient use of screen space, Highly customizable with scripts, Lightweight and fast, Keyboard shortcuts for window management, Low memory footprint.

On the other hand, i3 is a Os & Utilities product tagged with tiling, keyboarddriven, lightweight, configurable, unixlike.

Its standout features include Tiling window manager, Tree-like window organization, Customizable keyboard shortcuts, Simple, lightweight and fast, Support for multiple workspaces, and it shines with pros like Very efficient use of screen space, Highly customizable, Light on system resources, Keyboard-driven workflow, Stable and mature codebase.

Feature	bspwm	i3
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Os & Utilities	Os & Utilities

Product Overview

bspwm

Description: bspwm is a lightweight, keyboard-driven tiling window manager for Linux. It organizes windows in a binary space partitioning layout for efficient use of screen space. Configuration is done mostly through external scripts rather than built-in settings.

i3

Description: i3 is a tiling window manager for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. It is designed to be simple, fast, and lightweight while still being customizable and flexible. i3 organizes application windows in a tree-like structure and allows efficient window switching and placement.

Key Features Comparison

bspwm Features

• Binary space partitioning window layout
• Keyboard driven window management
• Flexible rule-based configuration
• Support for multi-monitor setups
• Minimal resource usage

i3 Features

• Tiling window manager
• Tree-like window organization
• Customizable keyboard shortcuts
• Simple, lightweight and fast
• Support for multiple workspaces

Pros & Cons Analysis

bspwm

Pros

• Very efficient use of screen space
• Highly customizable with scripts
• Lightweight and fast
• Keyboard shortcuts for window management
• Low memory footprint

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Manual configuration required
• Lack of GUI or menu
• Not beginner friendly
• Requires external scripts for some functionality

i3

Pros

• Very efficient use of screen space
• Highly customizable
• Light on system resources
• Keyboard-driven workflow
• Stable and mature codebase

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Manual configuration required
• Not designed for touchscreens
• Less flexibility in window arrangements
• Less integrated with desktop environment

Pricing Comparison

bspwm

• Open Source

i3

• Open Source
• Free