Buildbot vs AppVeyor

Struggling to choose between Buildbot and AppVeyor? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Buildbot is a Development solution with tags like automation, testing, build, cicd.

It boasts features such as Continuous integration and deployment, Configurable build steps, Plugin architecture, Web UI, REST API, Real-time build status, Source code management integration, Build scheduling, Notifications, Distributed building, Dashboard, Access control, Logging, Statistics, Customizable UI, Self-hosted, Multi-platform, Auto-scaling and pros including Open source and free, Highly customizable, Large plugin ecosystem, Active development community, Comprehensive feature set, Self-hosted option, Supports many version control systems, Real-time build monitoring, Distributed building capability, Web UI and REST API, Access control for security.

On the other hand, AppVeyor is a Development product tagged with cicd, testing, net, windows.

Its standout features include Continuous integration for .NET applications, Build pipeline configuration via YAML, Artifact management and storage, Test automation and parallel testing, Role-based access control, Real-time build status and notifications, Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, etc., and it shines with pros like Easy to set up and configure, Free for open source projects, Fast and reliable build infrastructure, Detailed build logs and history, Supports multiple platforms like .NET Framework, .NET Core, etc., Integrates seamlessly with popular source control systems.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Buildbot

Buildbot

Buildbot is an open-source continuous integration framework for automating software build, test, and release processes. It allows developers to detect problems early, monitor progress, and improve productivity.

Categories:
automation testing build cicd

Buildbot Features

  1. Continuous integration and deployment
  2. Configurable build steps
  3. Plugin architecture
  4. Web UI
  5. REST API
  6. Real-time build status
  7. Source code management integration
  8. Build scheduling
  9. Notifications
  10. Distributed building
  11. Dashboard
  12. Access control
  13. Logging
  14. Statistics
  15. Customizable UI
  16. Self-hosted
  17. Multi-platform
  18. Auto-scaling

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source and free

Highly customizable

Large plugin ecosystem

Active development community

Comprehensive feature set

Self-hosted option

Supports many version control systems

Real-time build monitoring

Distributed building capability

Web UI and REST API

Access control for security

Cons

Steep learning curve

Complex configuration

Limited prebuilt integrations

Requires self-hosting and maintenance

Not as user friendly as some alternatives


AppVeyor

AppVeyor

AppVeyor is a hosted continuous integration and deployment service for Windows and .NET applications. It builds, runs tests and deploys applications automatically when developers push code to their source control system.

Categories:
cicd testing net windows

AppVeyor Features

  1. Continuous integration for .NET applications
  2. Build pipeline configuration via YAML
  3. Artifact management and storage
  4. Test automation and parallel testing
  5. Role-based access control
  6. Real-time build status and notifications
  7. Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, etc.

Pricing

  • Free
  • Freemium
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Easy to set up and configure

Free for open source projects

Fast and reliable build infrastructure

Detailed build logs and history

Supports multiple platforms like .NET Framework, .NET Core, etc.

Integrates seamlessly with popular source control systems

Cons

Limited free plan with 100 build minutes per month

No native support for non-.NET technologies

Can be complex for larger, enterprise-level projects

Limited customization compared to self-hosted options