Castor EDC vs OpenMRS

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Castor EDC icon
Castor EDC
OpenMRS icon
OpenMRS

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Castor EDC and OpenMRS? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Castor EDC is a Online Services solution with tags like electronic-data-capture, clinical-trials, case-report-forms.

It boasts features such as Secure data capture and management, Customizable case report forms (CRFs), Real-time data monitoring and reporting, Audit trail and data validation, Integrated ePRO (electronic patient-reported outcomes), Flexible study design and configuration, Intuitive user interface, Regulatory compliance (e.g., 21 CFR Part 11) and pros including User-friendly platform for clinical researchers, Robust data security and privacy features, Streamlined data collection and management, Efficient study setup and configuration, Comprehensive reporting and analytics capabilities.

On the other hand, OpenMRS is a Health & Medical product tagged with opensource, medical-records, developing-countries.

Its standout features include Electronic medical records, Patient registration, Appointment scheduling, Clinical decision support, ePrescribing, Lab integration, Reporting and data analysis, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Customizable and extensible, Designed for developing countries, Supports multiple languages, Active developer community.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Castor EDC and OpenMRS?

When evaluating Castor EDC versus OpenMRS, both solutions serve different needs within the online services ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Castor EDC and OpenMRS have established themselves in the online services market. Key areas include electronic-data-capture, clinical-trials, case-report-forms.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Castor EDC and OpenMRS significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include electronic-data-capture, clinical-trials, case-report-forms.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include electronic-data-capture, clinical-trials and opensource, medical-records.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Castor EDC and OpenMRS. You might also explore electronic-data-capture, clinical-trials, case-report-forms for alternative approaches.

Feature Castor EDC OpenMRS
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Online Services Health & Medical
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Castor EDC
Castor EDC

Description: Castor EDC is an electronic data capture (EDC) platform used to build clinical trial databases and capture data for clinical research studies. It allows researchers to create online case report forms, collect participant data securely, and analyze results.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

OpenMRS
OpenMRS

Description: OpenMRS is an open source electronic medical record system designed for use in developing countries. It allows tracking of patients, managing visits, viewing reports, capturing vital signs, and more to improve healthcare delivery.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Castor EDC
Castor EDC Features
  • Secure data capture and management
  • Customizable case report forms (CRFs)
  • Real-time data monitoring and reporting
  • Audit trail and data validation
  • Integrated ePRO (electronic patient-reported outcomes)
  • Flexible study design and configuration
  • Intuitive user interface
  • Regulatory compliance (e.g., 21 CFR Part 11)
OpenMRS
OpenMRS Features
  • Electronic medical records
  • Patient registration
  • Appointment scheduling
  • Clinical decision support
  • ePrescribing
  • Lab integration
  • Reporting and data analysis

Pros & Cons Analysis

Castor EDC
Castor EDC
Pros
  • User-friendly platform for clinical researchers
  • Robust data security and privacy features
  • Streamlined data collection and management
  • Efficient study setup and configuration
  • Comprehensive reporting and analytics capabilities
Cons
  • Limited customization options for advanced users
  • Potential learning curve for users unfamiliar with EDC systems
  • Reliance on internet connectivity for data access
OpenMRS
OpenMRS
Pros
  • Open source and free
  • Customizable and extensible
  • Designed for developing countries
  • Supports multiple languages
  • Active developer community
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Limited support options
  • Requires IT infrastructure
  • Not user friendly for non-technical staff

Pricing Comparison

Castor EDC
Castor EDC
  • Subscription-Based
OpenMRS
OpenMRS
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs