Cellist vs Charles

Struggling to choose between Cellist and Charles? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Cellist is a Ai Tools & Services solution with tags like mobile-testing, web-testing, test-automation.

It boasts features such as Cross-browser and cross-device testing, Native and hybrid app testing, Manual and automated testing, Visual testing, Integration with CI/CD pipelines, Real device testing on cloud-based infrastructure, Scalable and on-demand test execution, Detailed reporting and analytics and pros including Comprehensive testing capabilities in a single platform, Ease of use and quick setup, Scalable and cost-effective cloud-based solution, Integrates with popular tools and frameworks, Provides real-device testing on a wide range of devices.

On the other hand, Charles is a Development product tagged with proxy, http, https, monitor, reverse-proxy.

Its standout features include HTTP proxy, HTTP monitor, Reverse proxy, View HTTP/HTTPS traffic, View requests, View responses, View HTTP headers, View cookies, View caching information, and it shines with pros like Debug HTTP/HTTPS connections, Inspect traffic between machine and internet, Identify performance issues, Troubleshoot network requests.

Feature	Cellist	Charles
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Ai Tools & Services	Development

Product Overview

Cellist

Description: Cellist is a cloud-based mobile and web testing automation platform that allows users to easily create, execute, and scale automated tests across real mobile devices and browsers. It provides capabilities for cross-browser testing, native & hybrid app testing, manual testing, visual testing, and integrating with CI/CD pipelines.

Charles

Description: Charles is an HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy that enables a developer to view all of the HTTP and SSL / HTTPS traffic between their machine and the Internet. This includes requests, responses and the HTTP headers (which contain the cookies and caching information).

Key Features Comparison

Cellist Features

• Cross-browser and cross-device testing
• Native and hybrid app testing
• Manual and automated testing
• Visual testing
• Integration with CI/CD pipelines
• Real device testing on cloud-based infrastructure
• Scalable and on-demand test execution
• Detailed reporting and analytics

Charles Features

• HTTP proxy
• HTTP monitor
• Reverse proxy
• View HTTP/HTTPS traffic
• View requests
• View responses
• View HTTP headers
• View cookies
• View caching information

Pros & Cons Analysis

Cellist

Pros

• Comprehensive testing capabilities in a single platform
• Ease of use and quick setup
• Scalable and cost-effective cloud-based solution
• Integrates with popular tools and frameworks
• Provides real-device testing on a wide range of devices

Cons

• Limited customization options for advanced users
• Pricing may be high for small teams or projects
• Dependency on internet connectivity for cloud-based testing

Charles

Pros

• Debug HTTP/HTTPS connections
• Inspect traffic between machine and internet
• Identify performance issues
• Troubleshoot network requests

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Manual configuration required
• Extra overhead for all HTTP traffic
• Potential privacy concerns

Pricing Comparison

Cellist

• Subscription-Based

Charles

• Free
• Open Source