CFR vs .NET Reflector

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

CFR icon
CFR
.NET Reflector icon
.NET Reflector

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between CFR and .NET Reflector? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CFR is a Development solution with tags like java, bytecode, decompiler, open-source.

It boasts features such as Decompiles bytecode back to Java source code, Allows editing and analysis of bytecode, Provides a Java API for working with bytecode programmatically, Supports debugging and understanding Java applications, Performs control flow analysis, Works with Java 8 and below and pros including Helps understand obfuscated or unfamiliar code, Enables low-level analysis and modification of bytecode, Free and open source, Active community support.

On the other hand, .NET Reflector is a Development product tagged with net, decompiler, disassembler, reflection.

Its standout features include Decompiles .NET assemblies into C# or IL code, Analyzes dependencies between assemblies, Supports add-ins for enhanced functionality, Integrates with Visual Studio, Supports debugging compiled assemblies, Provides class, method, property browsing, and it shines with pros like Easy to use graphical interface, Generates clean, readable code, Free for non-commercial use, Helpful for understanding 3rd party libraries, Useful for optimizing and troubleshooting code.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare CFR and .NET Reflector?

When evaluating CFR versus .NET Reflector, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

CFR and .NET Reflector have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include java, bytecode, decompiler.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between CFR and .NET Reflector significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include java, bytecode, decompiler, open-source.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include java, bytecode and net, decompiler.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between CFR and .NET Reflector. You might also explore java, bytecode, decompiler for alternative approaches.

Feature CFR .NET Reflector
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

CFR
CFR

Description: CFR is an open-source Java library and set of tools that allow you to view, edit, and analyze the bytecode of Java applications. It can decompile Java bytecode back into Java source code for debugging and understanding purposes.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

.NET Reflector
.NET Reflector

Description: .NET Reflector is a popular .NET decompiler and static analysis tool that allows developers to examine and understand the structure and code of .NET assemblies. It can decompile code back into a high-level programming language for analysis.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

CFR
CFR Features
  • Decompiles bytecode back to Java source code
  • Allows editing and analysis of bytecode
  • Provides a Java API for working with bytecode programmatically
  • Supports debugging and understanding Java applications
  • Performs control flow analysis
  • Works with Java 8 and below
.NET Reflector
.NET Reflector Features
  • Decompiles .NET assemblies into C# or IL code
  • Analyzes dependencies between assemblies
  • Supports add-ins for enhanced functionality
  • Integrates with Visual Studio
  • Supports debugging compiled assemblies
  • Provides class, method, property browsing

Pros & Cons Analysis

CFR
CFR
Pros
  • Helps understand obfuscated or unfamiliar code
  • Enables low-level analysis and modification of bytecode
  • Free and open source
  • Active community support
Cons
  • Limited support for newer Java versions
  • Decompilation not perfect, may require manual fixes
  • Steep learning curve
.NET Reflector
.NET Reflector
Pros
  • Easy to use graphical interface
  • Generates clean, readable code
  • Free for non-commercial use
  • Helpful for understanding 3rd party libraries
  • Useful for optimizing and troubleshooting code
Cons
  • Limited decompilation of obfuscated assemblies
  • Does not perfectly reproduce original source code
  • Commercial use requires purchase
  • Add-ins can increase cost for full functionality

Pricing Comparison

CFR
CFR
  • Open Source
.NET Reflector
.NET Reflector
  • Free
  • One-time Purchase

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs