Struggling to choose between Charles and Cellist? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.
Charles is a Development solution with tags like proxy, http, https, monitor, reverse-proxy.
It boasts features such as HTTP proxy, HTTP monitor, Reverse proxy, View HTTP/HTTPS traffic, View requests, View responses, View HTTP headers, View cookies, View caching information and pros including Debug HTTP/HTTPS connections, Inspect traffic between machine and internet, Identify performance issues, Troubleshoot network requests.
On the other hand, Cellist is a Ai Tools & Services product tagged with mobile-testing, web-testing, test-automation.
Its standout features include Cross-browser and cross-device testing, Native and hybrid app testing, Manual and automated testing, Visual testing, Integration with CI/CD pipelines, Real device testing on cloud-based infrastructure, Scalable and on-demand test execution, Detailed reporting and analytics, and it shines with pros like Comprehensive testing capabilities in a single platform, Ease of use and quick setup, Scalable and cost-effective cloud-based solution, Integrates with popular tools and frameworks, Provides real-device testing on a wide range of devices.
To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.
Charles is an HTTP proxy / HTTP monitor / Reverse Proxy that enables a developer to view all of the HTTP and SSL / HTTPS traffic between their machine and the Internet. This includes requests, responses and the HTTP headers (which contain the cookies and caching information).
Cellist is a cloud-based mobile and web testing automation platform that allows users to easily create, execute, and scale automated tests across real mobile devices and browsers. It provides capabilities for cross-browser testing, native & hybrid app testing, manual testing, visual testing, and integrating with CI/CD pipelines.