Cloud Commander vs filebrowser.org

Struggling to choose between Cloud Commander and filebrowser.org? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Cloud Commander is a File Management solution with tags like file-manager, cloud-storage, google-drive, dropbox, amazon-s3.

It boasts features such as File manager for cloud storage services, Unified interface to access files on local drives and cloud drives, Supports Google Drive, Dropbox, Amazon S3, OpenStack Swift, etc, Two-panel file manager interface, Basic file operations like copy, move, delete, rename, etc, Search files, Preview common file types, Share files and folders, FTP/SFTP support, Keyboard shortcuts and pros including Access multiple cloud storage services from one place, No need to install separate apps for each cloud provider, Works across different platforms like Windows, Mac, Linux, Open source and free, Actively developed and maintained.

On the other hand, filebrowser.org is a File Management product tagged with selfhosted, multiuser, permissions, search, preview, edit, archive.

Its standout features include Web-based file manager interface, Self-hosted, User accounts and permissions, Clean and simple UI, File browsing, File search, File previews, Text file editing, Zip/unzip files, Media streaming, Share files and folders, and it shines with pros like Easy to set up and use, Works across platforms through a browser, Secure - files stay on your server, Feature-rich, Open source and free.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Cloud Commander

Cloud Commander

Cloud Commander is an open-source file manager for managing files and folders in cloud storage services. It allows accessing files on local drives and popular cloud drives like Google Drive, Dropbox, Amazon S3, OpenStack Swift, and more from a unified interface.

Categories:
file-manager cloud-storage google-drive dropbox amazon-s3

Cloud Commander Features

  1. File manager for cloud storage services
  2. Unified interface to access files on local drives and cloud drives
  3. Supports Google Drive, Dropbox, Amazon S3, OpenStack Swift, etc
  4. Two-panel file manager interface
  5. Basic file operations like copy, move, delete, rename, etc
  6. Search files
  7. Preview common file types
  8. Share files and folders
  9. FTP/SFTP support
  10. Keyboard shortcuts

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free

Pros

Access multiple cloud storage services from one place

No need to install separate apps for each cloud provider

Works across different platforms like Windows, Mac, Linux

Open source and free

Actively developed and maintained

Cons

Less features compared to native cloud provider apps

Performance depends on internet connection speed

No offline access to cloud files

Limited to cloud storage, no other cloud services support

Steep learning curve for new users


filebrowser.org

filebrowser.org

Filebrowser is an open-source file manager that allows you to manage your files and folders through a web browser interface. It is self-hosted, allows multiple user accounts and permissions, has a simple and clean interface, and supports features like searching, previewing files, editing text files, zipping/unzipping, etc.

Categories:
selfhosted multiuser permissions search preview edit archive

Filebrowser.org Features

  1. Web-based file manager interface
  2. Self-hosted
  3. User accounts and permissions
  4. Clean and simple UI
  5. File browsing
  6. File search
  7. File previews
  8. Text file editing
  9. Zip/unzip files
  10. Media streaming
  11. Share files and folders

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Easy to set up and use

Works across platforms through a browser

Secure - files stay on your server

Feature-rich

Open source and free

Cons

Requires hosting your own server

Limited mobile support

Less features than desktop file managers

Can be resource intensive for large libraries