cobertura vs Atlassian Clover

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

cobertura icon
cobertura
Atlassian Clover icon
Atlassian Clover

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between cobertura and Atlassian Clover? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

cobertura is a Development solution with tags like java, code-coverage, testing, maven, ant.

It boasts features such as Code coverage measurement for Java programs, Integration with build tools like Maven and Ant, Identifies untested code, Generates coverage reports in multiple formats like HTML and XML and pros including Free and open source, Easy to integrate into build process, Helps improve test quality and coverage, Widely used and well-supported.

On the other hand, Atlassian Clover is a Development product tagged with java, code-coverage, unit-testing, maven, gradle.

Its standout features include Code coverage measurement, Integration with build tools like Maven and Gradle, Statement, branch and method coverage reporting, Highlighting untested code, Enforcing code quality policies, and it shines with pros like Helps improve test quality and coverage, Integrates seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines, Provides detailed coverage reports, Enables setting coverage goals.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare cobertura and Atlassian Clover?

When evaluating cobertura versus Atlassian Clover, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

cobertura and Atlassian Clover have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include java, code-coverage, testing.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between cobertura and Atlassian Clover significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include java, code-coverage, testing, maven.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include java, code-coverage and java, code-coverage.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between cobertura and Atlassian Clover. You might also explore java, code-coverage, testing for alternative approaches.

Feature cobertura Atlassian Clover
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

cobertura
cobertura

Description: Cobertura is an open source Java code coverage tool that calculates the percentage of code accessed by tests. It shows which parts of the codebase are lacking test coverage to help developers improve test quality. Cobertura integrates with build tools like Maven and Ant.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Atlassian Clover
Atlassian Clover

Description: Atlassian Clover is a code coverage tool for Java applications. It integrates with build tools like Maven and Gradle to show statement, branch, and method coverage. Clover helps developers write better unit tests and enforce code quality policies.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

cobertura
cobertura Features
  • Code coverage measurement for Java programs
  • Integration with build tools like Maven and Ant
  • Identifies untested code
  • Generates coverage reports in multiple formats like HTML and XML
Atlassian Clover
Atlassian Clover Features
  • Code coverage measurement
  • Integration with build tools like Maven and Gradle
  • Statement, branch and method coverage reporting
  • Highlighting untested code
  • Enforcing code quality policies

Pros & Cons Analysis

cobertura
cobertura
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Easy to integrate into build process
  • Helps improve test quality and coverage
  • Widely used and well-supported
Cons
  • Only for Java code
  • Configuration can be complex
  • Report generation can slow builds
  • Limited customization options
Atlassian Clover
Atlassian Clover
Pros
  • Helps improve test quality and coverage
  • Integrates seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines
  • Provides detailed coverage reports
  • Enables setting coverage goals
Cons
  • Setup can be complex
  • Reporting can be overwhelming initially
  • Limited language support (Java only)

Pricing Comparison

cobertura
cobertura
  • Open Source
Atlassian Clover
Atlassian Clover
  • Free
  • Subscription-Based

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs