Coverlipse vs Atlassian Clover

Struggling to choose between Coverlipse and Atlassian Clover? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Coverlipse is a Development solution with tags like eclipse, junit, code-coverage, mcdc, open-source.

It boasts features such as Integrates with JUnit for unit testing, Provides statement, branch and MC/DC coverage metrics, Displays coverage information directly in Eclipse code editor, Open source and free to use and pros including Easy to set up and use, Good integration with Eclipse IDE, Helpful for improving test coverage, Free and open source.

On the other hand, Atlassian Clover is a Development product tagged with java, code-coverage, unit-testing, maven, gradle.

Its standout features include Code coverage measurement, Integration with build tools like Maven and Gradle, Statement, branch and method coverage reporting, Highlighting untested code, Enforcing code quality policies, and it shines with pros like Helps improve test quality and coverage, Integrates seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines, Provides detailed coverage reports, Enables setting coverage goals.

Feature	Coverlipse	Atlassian Clover
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Coverlipse

Description: Coverlipse is an open-source code coverage tool for Eclipse that provides statement, branch, and MC/DC coverage metrics. It integrates with JUnit and plugs into the Eclipse IDE to display coverage information in the code editor.

Atlassian Clover

Description: Atlassian Clover is a code coverage tool for Java applications. It integrates with build tools like Maven and Gradle to show statement, branch, and method coverage. Clover helps developers write better unit tests and enforce code quality policies.

Key Features Comparison

Coverlipse Features

• Integrates with JUnit for unit testing
• Provides statement, branch and MC/DC coverage metrics
• Displays coverage information directly in Eclipse code editor
• Open source and free to use

Atlassian Clover Features

• Code coverage measurement
• Integration with build tools like Maven and Gradle
• Statement, branch and method coverage reporting
• Highlighting untested code
• Enforcing code quality policies

Pros & Cons Analysis

Coverlipse

Pros

• Easy to set up and use
• Good integration with Eclipse IDE
• Helpful for improving test coverage
• Free and open source

Cons

• Limited to Java code tested via JUnit
• May require some configuration
• Not as full-featured as some paid solutions

Atlassian Clover

Pros

• Helps improve test quality and coverage
• Integrates seamlessly into CI/CD pipelines
• Provides detailed coverage reports
• Enables setting coverage goals

Cons

• Setup can be complex
• Reporting can be overwhelming initially
• Limited language support (Java only)

Pricing Comparison

Coverlipse

• Open Source

Atlassian Clover

• Free
• Subscription-Based