Coverlipse vs OpenClover

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Coverlipse icon
Coverlipse
OpenClover icon
OpenClover

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Coverlipse and OpenClover? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Coverlipse is a Development solution with tags like eclipse, junit, code-coverage, mcdc, open-source.

It boasts features such as Integrates with JUnit for unit testing, Provides statement, branch and MC/DC coverage metrics, Displays coverage information directly in Eclipse code editor, Open source and free to use and pros including Easy to set up and use, Good integration with Eclipse IDE, Helpful for improving test coverage, Free and open source.

On the other hand, OpenClover is a Development product tagged with java, testing, code-coverage, unit-testing.

Its standout features include Code coverage measurement for Java code, Integration with build tools like Maven and Gradle, HTML reports to visualize code coverage, XML reports that can be parsed by other tools, Ability to drill down into code to see line coverage, Command line interface, Plug-in available for Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Widely used and well-supported, Integrates seamlessly into build process, Provides detailed reports on code coverage, Helps improve test quality.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Coverlipse and OpenClover?

When evaluating Coverlipse versus OpenClover, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Coverlipse and OpenClover have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include eclipse, junit, code-coverage.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Coverlipse and OpenClover significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include eclipse, junit, code-coverage, mcdc.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include eclipse, junit and java, testing.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Coverlipse and OpenClover. You might also explore eclipse, junit, code-coverage for alternative approaches.

Feature Coverlipse OpenClover
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Coverlipse
Coverlipse

Description: Coverlipse is an open-source code coverage tool for Eclipse that provides statement, branch, and MC/DC coverage metrics. It integrates with JUnit and plugs into the Eclipse IDE to display coverage information in the code editor.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

OpenClover
OpenClover

Description: OpenClover is an open-source code coverage tool for Java applications. It can generate code coverage reports to show the degree to which the source code is being tested by unit tests. Useful for improving test quality.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Coverlipse
Coverlipse Features
  • Integrates with JUnit for unit testing
  • Provides statement, branch and MC/DC coverage metrics
  • Displays coverage information directly in Eclipse code editor
  • Open source and free to use
OpenClover
OpenClover Features
  • Code coverage measurement for Java code
  • Integration with build tools like Maven and Gradle
  • HTML reports to visualize code coverage
  • XML reports that can be parsed by other tools
  • Ability to drill down into code to see line coverage
  • Command line interface
  • Plug-in available for Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA

Pros & Cons Analysis

Coverlipse
Coverlipse
Pros
  • Easy to set up and use
  • Good integration with Eclipse IDE
  • Helpful for improving test coverage
  • Free and open source
Cons
  • Limited to Java code tested via JUnit
  • May require some configuration
  • Not as full-featured as some paid solutions
OpenClover
OpenClover
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Widely used and well-supported
  • Integrates seamlessly into build process
  • Provides detailed reports on code coverage
  • Helps improve test quality
Cons
  • Setup can be complex
  • Reports can get very large for big projects
  • Only supports Java code
  • Lacks some advanced features found in commercial tools

Pricing Comparison

Coverlipse
Coverlipse
  • Open Source
OpenClover
OpenClover
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs