CrossBrowserTesting vs CutyCapt

Struggling to choose between CrossBrowserTesting and CutyCapt? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CrossBrowserTesting is a Online Services solution with tags like crossbrowser-testing, web-application-testing, browser-compatibility, responsive-testing.

It boasts features such as Test website on 2000+ real browsers and devices, Automatic screenshots and videos, Visual bug reporting, JavaScript Error logging, Page speed insights, Accessibility testing, Geolocation testing, Network throttling, Automated testing with Selenium and pros including Saves time compared to manual testing, Wide range of browsers and devices, Easy to use interface, Good for responsive design testing, Integrates with popular tools like Selenium.

On the other hand, CutyCapt is a Development product tagged with screenshot, pdf, webkit, automation.

Its standout features include Captures web pages as images, Converts web pages to PDF, Command-line interface, Headless browser, Webkit rendering engine, Open source, and it shines with pros like Automates screenshot capture, Good for testing and archiving web pages, Lightweight and fast, Works without GUI, Renders pages like a real browser, Free and customizable as open source.

Feature	CrossBrowserTesting	CutyCapt
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Online Services	Development

Product Overview

CrossBrowserTesting

Description: CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud-based web application testing tool that allows users to test their websites and web apps across various browsers, operating systems and devices. It aims to provide comprehensive cross-browser compatibility testing.

CutyCapt

Description: CutyCapt is an open-source command-line tool and library that captures WebKit's rendering of a web page. It allows developers to convert web pages to images or PDFs in an automated way for testing or archiving purposes.

Key Features Comparison

CrossBrowserTesting Features

• Test website on 2000+ real browsers and devices
• Automatic screenshots and videos
• Visual bug reporting
• JavaScript Error logging
• Page speed insights
• Accessibility testing
• Geolocation testing
• Network throttling
• Automated testing with Selenium

CutyCapt Features

• Captures web pages as images
• Converts web pages to PDF
• Command-line interface
• Headless browser
• Webkit rendering engine
• Open source

Pros & Cons Analysis

CrossBrowserTesting

Pros

• Saves time compared to manual testing
• Wide range of browsers and devices
• Easy to use interface
• Good for responsive design testing
• Integrates with popular tools like Selenium

Cons

• Can get expensive for large test suites
• Limited mobile testing features
• No end-to-end user journey testing
• Not ideal for complex web apps

CutyCapt

Pros

• Automates screenshot capture
• Good for testing and archiving web pages
• Lightweight and fast
• Works without GUI
• Renders pages like a real browser
• Free and customizable as open source

Cons

• Command-line only, no GUI
• Setup and usage has learning curve
• Limited to WebKit engine only
• Not many options for customization
• Development seems inactive

Pricing Comparison

CrossBrowserTesting

• Subscription-Based

CutyCapt

• Open Source