Crossref vs PubMed.gov

Struggling to choose between Crossref and PubMed.gov? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Crossref is a Online Services solution with tags like research, citations, references, linking, academic-publishing.

It boasts features such as DOI registration and metadata deposit services, Reference linking across publishers and platforms, Persistent identifiers (DOIs) for scholarly works, Metadata APIs for accessing publication metadata, Text and data mining services, Event Data service for tracking citations and other events, Similarity Check for plagiarism screening and pros including Increases discoverability and citation of research, Simplifies reference linking across publishers, Provides a central hub for metadata on scholarly publications, Enables text and data mining of content, Helps identify potential plagiarism issues.

On the other hand, PubMed.gov is a Education & Reference product tagged with search-engine, life-sciences, biomedical, medline, ncbi.

Its standout features include Search engine for accessing life sciences and biomedical literature, Contains over 30 million citations, Links to full-text articles from PubMed Central and publisher websites, Advanced search and filters to find relevant results, Saves searches and gets updates on new results, Links to related articles and cited references, Includes MEDLINE database records, and it shines with pros like Free to access, Comprehensive database of biomedical literature, Advanced search capabilities, Ability to save searches and get updates, Links to full text when available.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Crossref

Crossref

Crossref is a not-for-profit membership organization for scholarly publishing that enables researchers to easily find, cite, link, and assess academic publications across platforms and publishers. It provides reference linking services and persistent identifiers like Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs).

Categories:
research citations references linking academic-publishing

Crossref Features

  1. DOI registration and metadata deposit services
  2. Reference linking across publishers and platforms
  3. Persistent identifiers (DOIs) for scholarly works
  4. Metadata APIs for accessing publication metadata
  5. Text and data mining services
  6. Event Data service for tracking citations and other events
  7. Similarity Check for plagiarism screening

Pricing

  • Free
  • Freemium
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Increases discoverability and citation of research

Simplifies reference linking across publishers

Provides a central hub for metadata on scholarly publications

Enables text and data mining of content

Helps identify potential plagiarism issues

Cons

Cost for some services like DOI registration

Limited participation by some publishers

Metadata quality dependent on depositing publishers


PubMed.gov

PubMed.gov

PubMed is a free search engine accessing primarily the MEDLINE database of references and abstracts on life sciences and biomedical topics. PubMed is developed and maintained by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).

Categories:
search-engine life-sciences biomedical medline ncbi

PubMed.gov Features

  1. Search engine for accessing life sciences and biomedical literature
  2. Contains over 30 million citations
  3. Links to full-text articles from PubMed Central and publisher websites
  4. Advanced search and filters to find relevant results
  5. Saves searches and gets updates on new results
  6. Links to related articles and cited references
  7. Includes MEDLINE database records

Pricing

  • Free

Pros

Free to access

Comprehensive database of biomedical literature

Advanced search capabilities

Ability to save searches and get updates

Links to full text when available

Cons

May get overwhelming results for broad searches

Full text not always freely available

Somewhat complex interface