CruiseControl.Net vs CruiseControl.rb

Struggling to choose between CruiseControl.Net and CruiseControl.rb? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CruiseControl.Net is a Development solution with tags like build, test, automation, integration, open-source.

It boasts features such as Automated build process, Integration with source control tools like SVN and Git, Customizable build triggers, Configurable notifications for build status, Web dashboard, Plugins for additional functionality, Works with various languages and frameworks like .NET, Java, Ruby, etc. and pros including Free and open source, Easy to set up and configure, Active community support, Highly customizable and extensible, Integrates well with CI/CD workflows, Web UI provides overview of build status.

On the other hand, CruiseControl.rb is a Development product tagged with ruby, continuous-integration, testing.

Its standout features include Continuous integration server, Automatically builds, tests and deploys projects, Monitors source control repositories, Web dashboard to view build status and logs, Email notifications on build status, Supports various source control tools like Git, SVN, Mercurial etc, Plugin architecture to extend functionality, Built-in support for popular testing frameworks, Scalable architecture using DRb server, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and easy to install, Open source and free, Active community support, Highly customizable via plugins, Supports multiple source control tools, Integrates well with various testing frameworks.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

CruiseControl.Net

CruiseControl.Net

CruiseControl.Net is an open source continuous integration server for developers. It allows you to automatically build projects, run tests, and report on build status. CruiseControl.Net integrates with solutions like NAnt, Visual Studio, and SVN.

Categories:
build test automation integration open-source

CruiseControl.Net Features

  1. Automated build process
  2. Integration with source control tools like SVN and Git
  3. Customizable build triggers
  4. Configurable notifications for build status
  5. Web dashboard
  6. Plugins for additional functionality
  7. Works with various languages and frameworks like .NET, Java, Ruby, etc.

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

Easy to set up and configure

Active community support

Highly customizable and extensible

Integrates well with CI/CD workflows

Web UI provides overview of build status

Cons

Steep learning curve

Setup can be complex for larger projects

Limited native support for some languages/platforms

Web UI is basic and lacks some advanced features


CruiseControl.rb

CruiseControl.rb

CruiseControl.rb is an open-source continuous integration server written in Ruby. It allows developers to automatically and continuously build, test and deploy software projects by monitoring source control. It's lightweight, easy to install and configure.

Categories:
ruby continuous-integration testing

CruiseControl.rb Features

  1. Continuous integration server
  2. Automatically builds, tests and deploys projects
  3. Monitors source control repositories
  4. Web dashboard to view build status and logs
  5. Email notifications on build status
  6. Supports various source control tools like Git, SVN, Mercurial etc
  7. Plugin architecture to extend functionality
  8. Built-in support for popular testing frameworks
  9. Scalable architecture using DRb server

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Lightweight and easy to install

Open source and free

Active community support

Highly customizable via plugins

Supports multiple source control tools

Integrates well with various testing frameworks

Cons

Limited out-of-box functionality compared to other CI servers

Steep learning curve for configuration

Not as feature rich as some commercial alternatives

Can be difficult to scale to large projects

No native support for Windows