Cyberduck vs Drive File Stream by Google

Struggling to choose between Cyberduck and Drive File Stream by Google? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Cyberduck is a File Management solution with tags like ftp, sftp, webdav, cloud-storage, mac, windows.

It boasts features such as FTP/FTPS/SFTP/WebDAV/Amazon S3/OpenStack Swift/Backblaze B2/Microsoft Azure & OneDrive/Google Drive/Dropbox support, Resume interrupted transfers, Remote file editing, File synchronization, File sharing via generated URLs, SSH/SSL connectivity, Proxy support, Bookmarks for frequently accessed servers, Customizable interface, macOS & Windows support and pros including Free and open source, Easy to use interface, Supports many protocols and cloud services, File editing and sharing capabilities, Cross-platform support.

On the other hand, Drive File Stream by Google is a File Management product tagged with google, drive, file-stream, sync, storage, cloud, offline-access.

Its standout features include Syncs files between Google Drive and your computer, Allows offline access to files, Provides easy collaboration on files, Integrates with desktop apps like Microsoft Office, Backs up files automatically, Saves storage space on your computer, and it shines with pros like Seamless access to cloud files from desktop, Works offline once files are synced, Easy sharing and collaboration, No storage limits like regular Google Drive, Files are securely backed up in the cloud, Saves local storage space on your computer.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Cyberduck

Cyberduck

Cyberduck is a free and open source FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, OpenStack Swift, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive, Google Drive and Dropbox browser designed for macOS and Windows with a focus on ease of use. It supports resumes, drag & drop, file sharing and integrates tightly with the Mac OS X Finder.

Categories:
ftp sftp webdav cloud-storage mac windows

Cyberduck Features

  1. FTP/FTPS/SFTP/WebDAV/Amazon S3/OpenStack Swift/Backblaze B2/Microsoft Azure & OneDrive/Google Drive/Dropbox support
  2. Resume interrupted transfers
  3. Remote file editing
  4. File synchronization
  5. File sharing via generated URLs
  6. SSH/SSL connectivity
  7. Proxy support
  8. Bookmarks for frequently accessed servers
  9. Customizable interface
  10. macOS & Windows support

Pricing

  • Free
  • Freemium

Pros

Free and open source

Easy to use interface

Supports many protocols and cloud services

File editing and sharing capabilities

Cross-platform support

Cons

Lacks advanced FTP features for power users

No official Linux support

Setup can be tricky for novice users

Some features require paid subscription


Drive File Stream by Google

Drive File Stream by Google

Drive File Stream by Google is a file sync and storage application that allows users to access their Google Drive files from their computer. It syncs files between the cloud and local device, allowing offline access and collaboration.

Categories:
google drive file-stream sync storage cloud offline-access

Drive File Stream by Google Features

  1. Syncs files between Google Drive and your computer
  2. Allows offline access to files
  3. Provides easy collaboration on files
  4. Integrates with desktop apps like Microsoft Office
  5. Backs up files automatically
  6. Saves storage space on your computer

Pricing

  • Free

Pros

Seamless access to cloud files from desktop

Works offline once files are synced

Easy sharing and collaboration

No storage limits like regular Google Drive

Files are securely backed up in the cloud

Saves local storage space on your computer

Cons

Requires constant internet connection to sync changes

Limited desktop integration compared to Dropbox

Syncing large numbers of files can be slow

No version history on local files

No granular sharing controls

Lacks advanced collaboration features