Dust.js vs Interpose.js

Struggling to choose between Dust.js and Interpose.js? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Dust.js is a Development solution with tags like templating, clientside, serverside.

It boasts features such as Template inheritance, Automatic escaping for security, Asynchronous rendering, Streaming, Client-side and server-side rendering, Partial templates, Conditionals and loops, Helpers for formatting, Extensible with custom helpers and filters and pros including Lightweight and fast, Secure against XSS attacks, Good documentation, Active community support, Integration with Express.js for server-side rendering, Streaming allows progressive rendering.

On the other hand, Interpose.js is a Development product tagged with interception, aspectoriented-programming, function-calls.

Its standout features include Intercepts and modifies function calls, Supports synchronous and asynchronous function interception, Lightweight library with no dependencies, Easy to integrate into existing code, Allows adding cross-cutting concerns like logging without changing function code, and it shines with pros like Simple and lightweight, Powerful functionality for aspect-oriented programming, Easy to use API, No dependencies, Great for implementing logging, analytics, etc without changing code.

Feature	Dust.js	Interpose.js
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Dust.js

Description: Dust.js is a lightweight JavaScript templating library for both client-side and server-side rendering. It has a simple, easy-to-read syntax and aims to provide complete control of HTML output while being highly extensible.

Interpose.js

Description: Interpose.js is a small JavaScript library that allows you to intercept and modify function calls. It makes aspect-oriented programming simple in JavaScript.

Key Features Comparison

Dust.js Features

• Template inheritance
• Automatic escaping for security
• Asynchronous rendering
• Streaming
• Client-side and server-side rendering
• Partial templates
• Conditionals and loops
• Helpers for formatting
• Extensible with custom helpers and filters

Interpose.js Features

• Intercepts and modifies function calls
• Supports synchronous and asynchronous function interception
• Lightweight library with no dependencies
• Easy to integrate into existing code
• Allows adding cross-cutting concerns like logging without changing function code

Pros & Cons Analysis

Dust.js

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Secure against XSS attacks
• Good documentation
• Active community support
• Integration with Express.js for server-side rendering
• Streaming allows progressive rendering

Cons

• Less flexible compared to some other templating engines
• Limited adoption outside of LinkedIn where it originated
• Requires learning non-standard syntax

Interpose.js

Pros

• Simple and lightweight
• Powerful functionality for aspect-oriented programming
• Easy to use API
• No dependencies
• Great for implementing logging, analytics, etc without changing code

Cons

• Only works for JavaScript code
• Can make code more complex if overused
• Requires some restructuring for proper use
• Debugging can be more difficult with aspects

Pricing Comparison

Dust.js

• Open Source

Interpose.js

• Open Source