Earthly vs Ansible Semaphore

Struggling to choose between Earthly and Ansible Semaphore? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Earthly is a Development solution with tags like build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

It boasts features such as Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support and pros including Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

On the other hand, Ansible Semaphore is a Development product tagged with ansible, automation, configuration-management, devops.

Its standout features include Web-based UI for managing Ansible, Role-based access control, Playbook repository, Playbook scheduling, Inventory management, Playbook execution and monitoring, REST API, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Easy to install and configure, Good for small teams, Active development community, Integrates well with Ansible.

Feature	Earthly	Ansible Semaphore
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Ansible Semaphore

Description: Ansible Semaphore is an open source alternative to Ansible Tower that provides a web-based user interface and REST API for managing Ansible playbooks. It allows you to easily run Ansible playbooks and view detailed logs without needing direct access to Ansible.

Key Features Comparison

Earthly Features

• Declarative build definitions
• Automatic caching and parallelization
• Built specifically for monorepos
• Integration with Docker containers
• Support for incremental builds
• Cross-platform support

Ansible Semaphore Features

• Web-based UI for managing Ansible
• Role-based access control
• Playbook repository
• Playbook scheduling
• Inventory management
• Playbook execution and monitoring
• REST API

Pros & Cons Analysis

Earthly

Pros

• Fast and reproducible builds
• Simplifies build configuration
• Improves developer productivity
• Makes dependency management easier
• Good for large, complex projects

Cons

• Limited adoption so far
• Steep learning curve
• Less flexibility than general build tools
• Only supports Docker containers
• Mainly aimed at monorepos

Ansible Semaphore

Pros

• Open source and free
• Easy to install and configure
• Good for small teams
• Active development community
• Integrates well with Ansible

Cons

• Lacks some advanced features of Ansible Tower
• Not ideal for large enterprises
• Limited native integrations with 3rd party tools
• Less polished UI than Tower
• Limited support options

Pricing Comparison

Earthly

• Open Source

Ansible Semaphore

• Open Source