Engine Yard vs AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Struggling to choose between Engine Yard and AWS Elastic Beanstalk? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Engine Yard is a Development solution with tags like ruby, rails, php, paas, cloud-hosting.

It boasts features such as Automated cloud hosting, Application management and scaling, Support for Ruby, Ruby on Rails, PHP, Node.js, High availability architecture, Built-in monitoring, alerts and logging, Automatic vertical and horizontal scaling, Git and SVN deployment, Access to add-ons and services marketplace, Team management and collaboration tools, 24/7 expert support and pros including Fast and easy cloud deployment, Frees developers from infrastructure management, Scales applications seamlessly, High uptime and reliability, Expert support for troubleshooting, Integrated performance monitoring, Works well for Ruby, Rails and PHP apps.

On the other hand, AWS Elastic Beanstalk is a Development product tagged with cloud, aws, deployment, scaling.

Its standout features include Automatic application deployment and scaling, Load balancing and health monitoring, Automatic scaling based on metrics, Integrated with other AWS services, Supports multiple programming languages and platforms, Easy to set up and manage, Automatic operating system updates and security patches, and it shines with pros like Easy to use and manage, Scalable and highly available, Integrates with other AWS services, Supports a wide range of programming languages and platforms, Automatic updates and security patches.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Engine Yard

Engine Yard

Engine Yard is a platform as a service (PaaS) that provides automated cloud hosting, management, and scaling for Ruby on Rails and PHP applications. It handles provisioning, configuring, monitoring, patching, and managing servers and applications in the cloud.

Categories:
ruby rails php paas cloud-hosting

Engine Yard Features

  1. Automated cloud hosting
  2. Application management and scaling
  3. Support for Ruby, Ruby on Rails, PHP, Node.js
  4. High availability architecture
  5. Built-in monitoring, alerts and logging
  6. Automatic vertical and horizontal scaling
  7. Git and SVN deployment
  8. Access to add-ons and services marketplace
  9. Team management and collaboration tools
  10. 24/7 expert support

Pricing

  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Fast and easy cloud deployment

Frees developers from infrastructure management

Scales applications seamlessly

High uptime and reliability

Expert support for troubleshooting

Integrated performance monitoring

Works well for Ruby, Rails and PHP apps

Cons

Can be more expensive than self-managed infrastructure

Limited configuration compared to IaaS

Not ideal for complex or custom architectures

Vendor lock-in to some degree

Add-ons and extras increase cost


AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk is a service for deploying and scaling web applications and services developed with Java, .NET, PHP, Node.js, Python, Ruby, Go, and Docker on familiar servers such as Apache, Nginx, Passenger, and IIS.

Categories:
cloud aws deployment scaling

AWS Elastic Beanstalk Features

  1. Automatic application deployment and scaling
  2. Load balancing and health monitoring
  3. Automatic scaling based on metrics
  4. Integrated with other AWS services
  5. Supports multiple programming languages and platforms
  6. Easy to set up and manage
  7. Automatic operating system updates and security patches

Pricing

  • Pay-As-You-Go

Pros

Easy to use and manage

Scalable and highly available

Integrates with other AWS services

Supports a wide range of programming languages and platforms

Automatic updates and security patches

Cons

Limited control over underlying infrastructure

Vendor lock-in with AWS

Can be more expensive than managing infrastructure directly