FleetDB vs OrbitDB

Struggling to choose between FleetDB and OrbitDB? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

FleetDB is a Business & Commerce solution with tags like time-series, metrics, sensor-data, events, lightweight, scalable, docker, kubernetes.

It boasts features such as Time series data storage, High write throughput, Fast reads, Numeric data optimization, Lightweight, Scalable, Docker and Kubernetes deployments and pros including Open source, Fast performance, Scalable, Lightweight, Easy deployment.

On the other hand, OrbitDB is a Development product tagged with decentralized, peertopeer, ipfs, distributed-web.

Its standout features include Decentralized database, Built on IPFS, Event log for database changes, Supports CRUD operations, Access control lists, Queryable database API, and it shines with pros like Decentralization provides censorship resistance, Data is distributed across nodes, Immutable append-only log, Fine-grained access control, Interoperable with other IPFS tools.

Feature	FleetDB	OrbitDB
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Business & Commerce	Development

Product Overview

FleetDB

Description: FleetDB is an open-source time series database optimized for fast reads and writes of numeric data. It is useful for capturing metrics, sensor data, and events. FleetDB is lightweight, scalable, and easy to deploy in Docker and Kubernetes.

OrbitDB

Description: OrbitDB is a decentralized peer-to-peer database that allows developers to build decentralized applications. It works on top of IPFS, providing an API for managing databases on the distributed web.

Key Features Comparison

FleetDB Features

• Time series data storage
• High write throughput
• Fast reads
• Numeric data optimization
• Lightweight
• Scalable
• Docker and Kubernetes deployments

OrbitDB Features

• Decentralized database
• Built on IPFS
• Event log for database changes
• Supports CRUD operations
• Access control lists
• Queryable database API

Pros & Cons Analysis

FleetDB

Pros

• Open source
• Fast performance
• Scalable
• Lightweight
• Easy deployment

Cons

• Limited documentation
• Not ideal for non-numeric data
• No built-in monitoring or alerting
• Limited ecosystem compared to more established databases

OrbitDB

Pros

• Decentralization provides censorship resistance
• Data is distributed across nodes
• Immutable append-only log
• Fine-grained access control
• Interoperable with other IPFS tools

Cons

• Still in early development
• Limited query capabilities
• Performance limitations of IPFS
• No built-in indexing or relationships

Pricing Comparison

FleetDB

• Open Source

OrbitDB

• Open Source