FlexPDE vs OpenModelica

Struggling to choose between FlexPDE and OpenModelica? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

FlexPDE is a Development solution with tags like pde, physics, engineering, modeling, simulation.

It boasts features such as Finite element analysis for solving PDEs in 1D, 2D & 3D, Intuitive graphical user interface for model setup, Large library of predefined models across engineering disciplines, Scripting language for automating workflows, Adaptive mesh refinement for optimal mesh density, Parallel processing support, CAD import/export, Visualization tools for results analysis and pros including User-friendly interface, Fast and accurate solver, Broad range of applications, Automation capabilities, Adaptive meshing saves computation time, Scales to large models via parallelization, Tight CAD integration.

On the other hand, OpenModelica is a Development product tagged with opensource, modeling, simulation, integrated-environment, industrial-usage, academic-usage.

Its standout features include Modeling and simulation of complex systems, Acausal modeling with Modelica language, Integrated development environment, Model library with many common component models, Simulation of both continuous and discrete systems, Optimization and symbolic algorithms, Import/export of models and libraries, Modeling, simulation and analysis of electrical power systems, Real-time simulation and hardware-in-the-loop simulations, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Cross-platform (Windows, Linux, Mac), Active development community, Good documentation and tutorials, Flexible licensing for commercial use.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

FlexPDE

FlexPDE

FlexPDE is a mathematical modeling software used for solving partial differential equations in 2D and 3D. It has an intuitive graphical user interface and provides fast, accurate solutions for problems in physics and engineering.

Categories:
pde physics engineering modeling simulation

FlexPDE Features

  1. Finite element analysis for solving PDEs in 1D, 2D & 3D
  2. Intuitive graphical user interface for model setup
  3. Large library of predefined models across engineering disciplines
  4. Scripting language for automating workflows
  5. Adaptive mesh refinement for optimal mesh density
  6. Parallel processing support
  7. CAD import/export
  8. Visualization tools for results analysis

Pricing

  • Free trial
  • Subscription-based

Pros

User-friendly interface

Fast and accurate solver

Broad range of applications

Automation capabilities

Adaptive meshing saves computation time

Scales to large models via parallelization

Tight CAD integration

Cons

Steep learning curve

Limited technical support

Costly for full featured license

Not open source


OpenModelica

OpenModelica

OpenModelica is an open-source modeling and simulation environment intended for industrial and academic usage. It provides an integrated graphical modeling, compilation and simulation environment based on open standards.

Categories:
opensource modeling simulation integrated-environment industrial-usage academic-usage

OpenModelica Features

  1. Modeling and simulation of complex systems
  2. Acausal modeling with Modelica language
  3. Integrated development environment
  4. Model library with many common component models
  5. Simulation of both continuous and discrete systems
  6. Optimization and symbolic algorithms
  7. Import/export of models and libraries
  8. Modeling, simulation and analysis of electrical power systems
  9. Real-time simulation and hardware-in-the-loop simulations

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

Cross-platform (Windows, Linux, Mac)

Active development community

Good documentation and tutorials

Flexible licensing for commercial use

Cons

Limited analysis and debugging capabilities compared to commercial tools

Less extensive model libraries than commercial alternatives

Lacks some advanced simulation algorithms present in commercial tools