Freebase vs Wikidata

Struggling to choose between Freebase and Wikidata? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Freebase is a Online Services solution with tags like knowledge-graph, semantic-web, linked-data, knowledge-base.

It boasts features such as Open knowledge graph database, Structured data about real-world entities and events, Collaborative data collection and curation, APIs for querying and accessing data, Linked open data model to connect related facts, Entity extraction from unstructured text, Knowledge graph visualization and pros including Massive database of structured real-world knowledge, Integrates data from many sources, Allows anyone to contribute data, Powerful APIs for building applications, Linked data model enables knowledge discovery, Free and open source.

On the other hand, Wikidata is a Online Services product tagged with knowledge-base, structured-data, wikimedia, wikipedia.

Its standout features include Centralized storage of structured data, Supports 300+ languages, Open data that anyone can edit, Query interface to access data, API access to data, Linked open data integrated with other databases, Used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, and it shines with pros like Free and open access, Community-driven data curation, Multilingual support, Extensive structured knowledge base, Frequent updates and additions, Linked open data increases utility, Wide adoption by major websites.

Feature	Freebase	Wikidata
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Online Services	Online Services

Product Overview

Freebase

Description: Freebase is an open, graph-shaped database of facts about the real world. Freebase aims to organize human knowledge similar to databases like Wikipedia. It allows users to contribute facts and data that can be interlinked through its graph-shaped model.

Wikidata

Description: Wikidata is a free and open knowledge base that can be read and edited by both humans and machines. It acts as central storage for the structured data of its Wikimedia sister projects including Wikipedia, Wikivoyage, Wiktionary, Wikisource, and others.

Key Features Comparison

Freebase Features

• Open knowledge graph database
• Structured data about real-world entities and events
• Collaborative data collection and curation
• APIs for querying and accessing data
• Linked open data model to connect related facts
• Entity extraction from unstructured text
• Knowledge graph visualization

Wikidata Features

• Centralized storage of structured data
• Supports 300+ languages
• Open data that anyone can edit
• Query interface to access data
• API access to data
• Linked open data integrated with other databases
• Used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects

Pros & Cons Analysis

Freebase

Pros

• Massive database of structured real-world knowledge
• Integrates data from many sources
• Allows anyone to contribute data
• Powerful APIs for building applications
• Linked data model enables knowledge discovery
• Free and open source

Cons

• Requires technical expertise to use APIs
• Data quality dependent on contributors
• Limited compared to large knowledge graphs like Wikidata
• Shutdown in 2016 so no longer actively developed

Wikidata

Pros

• Free and open access
• Community-driven data curation
• Multilingual support
• Extensive structured knowledge base
• Frequent updates and additions
• Linked open data increases utility
• Wide adoption by major websites

Cons

• Data quality dependent on contributors
• Complex structure has learning curve
• Limited tools for analysis compared to databases
• Less features than commercial knowledge bases
• Some incorrect or incomplete data
• Biases possible from community editing model

Pricing Comparison

Freebase

• Open Source

Wikidata

• Open Source
• Free