FreeBASIC vs QB64

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

FreeBASIC icon
FreeBASIC
QB64 icon
QB64

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between FreeBASIC and QB64? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

FreeBASIC is a Development solution with tags like basic, compiler, open-source, console, gui, web-applications.

It boasts features such as Supports procedural and object-oriented programming, Syntax similar to QBasic/QuickBASIC, Can create console, GUI and web applications, Has bindings for GTK+, SDL, OpenGL, Allegro, etc, Can interface with C libraries, Supports multi-platform compilation for Windows, Linux and macOS and pros including Free and open source, Easy to learn for beginners, Fast compilation, Produces small and efficient executables, Large community support.

On the other hand, QB64 is a Development product tagged with basic, compiler, ide, qbasic, windows, linux, macos.

Its standout features include Supports most QBasic statements and functions, Can create native executables for Windows, Linux and macOS, Integrated IDE and debugger, Supports modern features like subroutines, enums and user types, Graphics and sound support, Can use most QBasic libraries and code with little to no modification, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Familiar BASIC syntax, Cross-platform, Active community support, Allows creating distributable standalone apps.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare FreeBASIC and QB64?

When evaluating FreeBASIC versus QB64, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

FreeBASIC and QB64 have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include basic, compiler, open-source.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between FreeBASIC and QB64 significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include basic, compiler, open-source, console.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include basic, compiler and basic, compiler.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between FreeBASIC and QB64. You might also explore basic, compiler, open-source for alternative approaches.

Feature FreeBASIC QB64
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

FreeBASIC
FreeBASIC

Description: FreeBASIC is an open-source, free BASIC compiler for Windows, Linux, and macOS. It is compatible with QBasic/QuickBASIC and allows developers to easily create console, graphical GUI, and web applications. FreeBASIC supports modern features like object-oriented programming.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

QB64
QB64

Description: QB64 is a modern extended BASIC language compiler that aims for compatibility with QBasic. It allows creating native executables for Windows, Linux and macOS. QB64 includes an integrated IDE, debugger and other development tools.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

FreeBASIC
FreeBASIC Features
  • Supports procedural and object-oriented programming
  • Syntax similar to QBasic/QuickBASIC
  • Can create console, GUI and web applications
  • Has bindings for GTK+, SDL, OpenGL, Allegro, etc
  • Can interface with C libraries
  • Supports multi-platform compilation for Windows, Linux and macOS
QB64
QB64 Features
  • Supports most QBasic statements and functions
  • Can create native executables for Windows, Linux and macOS
  • Integrated IDE and debugger
  • Supports modern features like subroutines, enums and user types
  • Graphics and sound support
  • Can use most QBasic libraries and code with little to no modification

Pros & Cons Analysis

FreeBASIC
FreeBASIC
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Easy to learn for beginners
  • Fast compilation
  • Produces small and efficient executables
  • Large community support
Cons
  • Not as full-featured as commercial BASIC dialects
  • Limited IDE and debugging support
  • Documentation can be lacking in some areas
QB64
QB64
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Familiar BASIC syntax
  • Cross-platform
  • Active community support
  • Allows creating distributable standalone apps
Cons
  • Limited adoption and popularity compared to other languages
  • Documentation could be more extensive
  • IDE is basic compared to full-featured IDEs
  • Some QBasic features are unsupported or work differently

Pricing Comparison

FreeBASIC
FreeBASIC
  • Open Source
QB64
QB64
  • Free
  • Open Source

Get More Information

FreeBASIC
FreeBASIC
FreeBASIC
Learn More About FreeBASIC
QB64
QB64
QB64
Learn More About QB64

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Right tool. Less hassle.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal