GAP vs SageMath

Struggling to choose between GAP and SageMath? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

GAP is a Education & Reference solution with tags like algebra, group-theory, computer-algebra-system.

It boasts features such as Group theory algorithms and data structures, Programming language for implementing algebraic algorithms, Extensive library of group theory functions, GAP kernel provides basic functions for lists, records, etc, Modular architecture allows extending functionality via packages and pros including Powerful tool for computational group theory research, Open source with active development community, Cross-platform support, Extensive documentation and tutorials available, Flexible and extensible via packages.

On the other hand, SageMath is a Education & Reference product tagged with algebra, analysis, calculus, combinatorics, geometry, number-theory, research, teaching.

Its standout features include Open-source mathematical software system, Supports various mathematical domains like algebra, calculus, combinatorics, numerical computation, Includes libraries like NumPy, SciPy, SymPy, Matplotlib, Interactive notebook interface (Sage Notebook) for calculations, plotting, documentation, Supports code in Python, Cython, C/C++, Fortran and more, Can be used as a server to collaborate with others, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Very extensive math functionality, Integrates many existing math libraries, Can be extended by writing new modules, Notebook interface good for learning and documentation.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

GAP

GAP

GAP is an open-source computer algebra system for computational discrete algebra, with particular emphasis on computational group theory. It provides a programming language, a library of thousands of functions implementing algebraic algorithms, and extensive documentation.

Categories:
algebra group-theory computer-algebra-system

GAP Features

  1. Group theory algorithms and data structures
  2. Programming language for implementing algebraic algorithms
  3. Extensive library of group theory functions
  4. GAP kernel provides basic functions for lists, records, etc
  5. Modular architecture allows extending functionality via packages

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Powerful tool for computational group theory research

Open source with active development community

Cross-platform support

Extensive documentation and tutorials available

Flexible and extensible via packages

Cons

Steep learning curve

Limited capabilities outside of group theory

User interface not as polished as commercial alternatives

Lacks some features of computer algebra systems like Mathematica or Maple


SageMath

SageMath

SageMath is an open-source mathematics software system licensed under the GPL. It builds on top of many existing open-source packages including NumPy, SciPy, matplotlib, Sympy, and more. It provides an interactive environment and library to support research and teaching across algebra, analysis, calculus, combinatorics, geometry, number theory, and more.

Categories:
algebra analysis calculus combinatorics geometry number-theory research teaching

SageMath Features

  1. Open-source mathematical software system
  2. Supports various mathematical domains like algebra, calculus, combinatorics, numerical computation
  3. Includes libraries like NumPy, SciPy, SymPy, Matplotlib
  4. Interactive notebook interface (Sage Notebook) for calculations, plotting, documentation
  5. Supports code in Python, Cython, C/C++, Fortran and more
  6. Can be used as a server to collaborate with others

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

Very extensive math functionality

Integrates many existing math libraries

Can be extended by writing new modules

Notebook interface good for learning and documentation

Cons

Less user friendly than some commercial alternatives

Not as fast as optimized commercial math software

Requires more programming knowledge than some alternatives

Documentation can be technical

Not as polished UI as some alternatives