Getty Images vs Snapixen

Struggling to choose between Getty Images and Snapixen? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Getty Images is a Photos & Graphics solution with tags like images, photos, stock-photography, licensing, royaltyfree.

It boasts features such as Extensive library of over 200 million high-quality stock photos, illustrations, vectors and videos, Advanced search tools to easily find desired media, Different licensing options for commercial or editorial use, Ability to manage lightboxes to organize selected images, Integration with various content management systems and design tools, Customizable pricing based on download size and intended use and pros including Massive content library with frequent new additions, Reasonable pricing tiers, Easy to search and find on-brand images, Licensing protects from copyright claims, Integrates seamlessly into workflows.

On the other hand, Snapixen is a Os & Utilities product tagged with linux, screenshot, image-editing, cloud-storage.

Its standout features include Capture full screen, window, or custom region screenshots, Basic image editing like cropping, resizing, rotating, Drawing tools to annotate screenshots, Upload screenshots to cloud services like Imgur and Flickr, Keyboard shortcuts for quick access, Support for multiple Linux desktop environments like GNOME, KDE, Xfce, Open source and free, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast, Easy to use interface, Good set of screenshot capture and editing features, Cloud integration for sharing screenshots, Customizable keyboard shortcuts, Works across different Linux desktops.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Getty Images

Getty Images

Getty Images is a stock photography and licensing company based in Seattle. It provides millions of high-quality, royalty-free images, videos, and music files that can be licensed for both commercial and editorial use.

Categories:
images photos stock-photography licensing royaltyfree

Getty Images Features

  1. Extensive library of over 200 million high-quality stock photos, illustrations, vectors and videos
  2. Advanced search tools to easily find desired media
  3. Different licensing options for commercial or editorial use
  4. Ability to manage lightboxes to organize selected images
  5. Integration with various content management systems and design tools
  6. Customizable pricing based on download size and intended use

Pricing

  • Subscription-Based
  • Pay-As-You-Go
  • Custom Pricing

Pros

Massive content library with frequent new additions

Reasonable pricing tiers

Easy to search and find on-brand images

Licensing protects from copyright claims

Integrates seamlessly into workflows

Cons

Can be expensive for high-res or commercial use files

Limited selection of vector images and illustrations

Restrictions on image use and modifications

Confusing licensing terms

Not all content is exclusive to Getty


Snapixen

Snapixen

Snapixen is an open-source screenshot tool for Linux that allows you to capture, edit, annotate, and share screenshots. It has basic image editing features and integrates with popular cloud storage services.

Categories:
linux screenshot image-editing cloud-storage

Snapixen Features

  1. Capture full screen, window, or custom region screenshots
  2. Basic image editing like cropping, resizing, rotating
  3. Drawing tools to annotate screenshots
  4. Upload screenshots to cloud services like Imgur and Flickr
  5. Keyboard shortcuts for quick access
  6. Support for multiple Linux desktop environments like GNOME, KDE, Xfce
  7. Open source and free

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free

Pros

Lightweight and fast

Easy to use interface

Good set of screenshot capture and editing features

Cloud integration for sharing screenshots

Customizable keyboard shortcuts

Works across different Linux desktops

Cons

Limited to Linux only

Lacks some advanced editing features

Sharing options could be expanded

Documentation could be improved