Gitit vs Static Site Boilerplate

Struggling to choose between Gitit and Static Site Boilerplate? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Gitit is a Development solution with tags like wiki, haskell, collaboration, documentation.

It boasts features such as Written in Haskell, Uses Git or Darcs for version control, Supports Markdown and LaTeX formatting, Has a WYSIWYG editor, Can export to PDF and HTML, Has an API for programmatic access and pros including Open source with an MIT license, Simple and lightweight, Integrates nicely with Git/Darcs version control, Good performance for a Haskell application.

On the other hand, Static Site Boilerplate is a Development product tagged with starter-kit, static-site, boilerplate, webpack, postcss, es6.

Its standout features include Modular file structure, Sass styling, Responsive design, Webpack bundling, PostCSS processing, ES6 support, Performance optimizations, and it shines with pros like Open source, Modern build tools, Modular and scalable, Good for static sites, Fast load times.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.