Glassfish vs Payara Server

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Glassfish icon
Glassfish
Payara Server icon
Payara Server

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Glassfish and Payara Server? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Glassfish is a Development solution with tags like java, web-services, application-server.

It boasts features such as Full implementation of Java EE, High performance, Easy clustering, Integrated administration console, Developer friendly and pros including Open source, Free to use, Wide platform support, High scalability, Good documentation and community support.

On the other hand, Payara Server is a Development product tagged with java, jakarta-ee, glassfish, open-source.

Its standout features include Full compatibility with Java EE 8, Production-ready clustering, 24/7 Mission Control monitoring, Enhanced security with Payara MicroProfile JWT, Simplified troubleshooting and administration, Fast application deployment, and it shines with pros like Open source and free to use, Very stable and reliable, Great performance, Easy clustering setup, User-friendly admin console, Active community support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Glassfish and Payara Server?

When evaluating Glassfish versus Payara Server, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Glassfish and Payara Server have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include java, web-services, application-server.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Glassfish and Payara Server significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include java, web-services, application-server.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include java, web-services and java, jakarta-ee.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Glassfish and Payara Server. You might also explore java, web-services, application-server for alternative approaches.

Feature Glassfish Payara Server
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Glassfish
Glassfish

Description: Glassfish is an open source application server that implements Java EE specifications. It is developed by Oracle and the open source community to run Java applications and web services efficiently and securely.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Payara Server
Payara Server

Description: Payara Server is an open source application server derived from GlassFish Server Open Source Edition. It adds patches, bug fixes and enhancements on top of the GlassFish codebase. Key features include production-ready clustering, simplified troubleshooting and administration.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Glassfish
Glassfish Features
  • Full implementation of Java EE
  • High performance
  • Easy clustering
  • Integrated administration console
  • Developer friendly
Payara Server
Payara Server Features
  • Full compatibility with Java EE 8
  • Production-ready clustering
  • 24/7 Mission Control monitoring
  • Enhanced security with Payara MicroProfile JWT
  • Simplified troubleshooting and administration
  • Fast application deployment

Pros & Cons Analysis

Glassfish
Glassfish
Pros
  • Open source
  • Free to use
  • Wide platform support
  • High scalability
  • Good documentation and community support
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Not as feature rich as proprietary options
  • Limited commercial support options
Payara Server
Payara Server
Pros
  • Open source and free to use
  • Very stable and reliable
  • Great performance
  • Easy clustering setup
  • User-friendly admin console
  • Active community support
Cons
  • Steep learning curve for beginners
  • Not as lightweight as Tomcat
  • Lacks some advanced features of proprietary app servers
  • Documentation could be more extensive

Pricing Comparison

Glassfish
Glassfish
  • Open Source
Payara Server
Payara Server
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs