GLAuth vs 389 Directory Server

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

GLAuth icon
GLAuth
389 Directory Server icon
389 Directory Server

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between GLAuth and 389 Directory Server? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

GLAuth is a Network & Admin solution with tags like open-source, authentication, access-control, ldap, radius, kerberos.

It boasts features such as Supports multiple authentication mechanisms including LDAP, RADIUS, Kerberos, and more, Provides authentication services and access control for Linux, UNIX, and Windows servers, Open source and highly customizable, Scalable and reliable authentication solution, Supports multi-factor authentication, Integrates with various third-party applications and services and pros including Flexible and adaptable to different authentication requirements, Cost-effective due to being open source, Highly scalable and can handle large user bases, Actively maintained and supported by the open-source community, Offers strong security features like multi-factor authentication.

On the other hand, 389 Directory Server is a Network & Admin product tagged with ldap, directory, server, replication, security.

Its standout features include LDAP server, Multi-master replication, Access control policies, Password policies, Account lockout, Logging and monitoring, CLI and web-based admin tools, Integration with SSSD and IPA, Schema management, Database backends like LMDB and Berkeley DB, and it shines with pros like Open source, Enterprise-grade performance and scalability, Robust access control and security features, Multi-master replication for high availability, Wide protocol support (LDAP, LDAPI, StartTLS, etc), Backward compatible with Fedora Directory Server.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare GLAuth and 389 Directory Server?

When evaluating GLAuth versus 389 Directory Server, both solutions serve different needs within the network & admin ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

GLAuth and 389 Directory Server have established themselves in the network & admin market. Key areas include open-source, authentication, access-control.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between GLAuth and 389 Directory Server significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include open-source, authentication, access-control, ldap.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include open-source, authentication and ldap, directory.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between GLAuth and 389 Directory Server. You might also explore open-source, authentication, access-control for alternative approaches.

Feature GLAuth 389 Directory Server
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Network & Admin Network & Admin
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

GLAuth
GLAuth

Description: GLAuth is an open source authentication server that provides authentication services and access control for Linux, UNIX, and Windows servers. It supports multiple authentication mechanisms including LDAP, RADIUS, Kerberos, and more.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

389 Directory Server
389 Directory Server

Description: 389 Directory Server is an open source enterprise-class LDAP server developed by Red Hat. It is fast, scalable, and robust, supporting a wide range of LDAP clients with features like multi-master replication, security, and administrative controls.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

GLAuth
GLAuth Features
  • Supports multiple authentication mechanisms including LDAP, RADIUS, Kerberos, and more
  • Provides authentication services and access control for Linux, UNIX, and Windows servers
  • Open source and highly customizable
  • Scalable and reliable authentication solution
  • Supports multi-factor authentication
  • Integrates with various third-party applications and services
389 Directory Server
389 Directory Server Features
  • LDAP server
  • Multi-master replication
  • Access control policies
  • Password policies
  • Account lockout
  • Logging and monitoring
  • CLI and web-based admin tools
  • Integration with SSSD and IPA
  • Schema management
  • Database backends like LMDB and Berkeley DB

Pros & Cons Analysis

GLAuth
GLAuth
Pros
  • Flexible and adaptable to different authentication requirements
  • Cost-effective due to being open source
  • Highly scalable and can handle large user bases
  • Actively maintained and supported by the open-source community
  • Offers strong security features like multi-factor authentication
Cons
  • Requires technical expertise to set up and configure
  • Limited out-of-the-box functionality compared to commercial solutions
  • Relies on the open-source community for support and updates
  • May have a steeper learning curve for non-technical users
389 Directory Server
389 Directory Server
Pros
  • Open source
  • Enterprise-grade performance and scalability
  • Robust access control and security features
  • Multi-master replication for high availability
  • Wide protocol support (LDAP, LDAPI, StartTLS, etc)
  • Backward compatible with Fedora Directory Server
Cons
  • Complex installation and configuration
  • Steep learning curve
  • Limited Windows AD integration features
  • Lacks GUI for administration
  • Not as widely used as Active Directory

Pricing Comparison

GLAuth
GLAuth
  • Open Source
389 Directory Server
389 Directory Server
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs