GNU gettext vs Graphite (SIL)

Struggling to choose between GNU gettext and Graphite (SIL)? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

GNU gettext is a Development solution with tags like translation, localization, internationalization, i18n.

It boasts features such as Translation Memory - Stores translations for reuse, Plural Forms - Supports plural forms in translations, PO Files - Stores translations in portable object (PO) text files, GNU Gettext Utilities - Command line tools like msgfmt, msgmerge, xgettext, Programming APIs - APIs for multiple programming languages like C, Python, PHP, Perl, Ruby, etc, Charset Conversion - Automatically converts between character sets, Context Support - Supports pgettext for context-aware translations and pros including Widely used and well supported, Integrates well with common programming languages, Helps produce professional quality translations, Reduces localization costs by reusing translations, Open source with active development community.

On the other hand, Graphite (SIL) is a Education & Reference product tagged with orthography, language-development, sil, nonlatin-scripts.

Its standout features include Orthography design, Font development, Keyboard layout design, Dictionary development, Reading material development, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, User-friendly interface, Supports minority languages, Allows collaboration.

Feature	GNU gettext	Graphite (SIL)
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Education & Reference

Product Overview

GNU gettext

Description: GNU gettext is a software translation tool that allows programmers to write applications with interfaces that can be translated into multiple languages. It provides localization support for software.

Graphite (SIL)

Description: Graphite is a learner-friendly software tool, created by SIL international, that enables language communities to adapt Latin script to new languages. It allows users to easily design, publish and share practical orthographies.

Key Features Comparison

GNU gettext Features

• Translation Memory - Stores translations for reuse
• Plural Forms - Supports plural forms in translations
• PO Files - Stores translations in portable object (PO) text files
• GNU Gettext Utilities - Command line tools like msgfmt, msgmerge, xgettext
• Programming APIs - APIs for multiple programming languages like C, Python, PHP, Perl, Ruby, etc
• Charset Conversion - Automatically converts between character sets
• Context Support - Supports pgettext for context-aware translations

Graphite (SIL) Features

• Orthography design
• Font development
• Keyboard layout design
• Dictionary development
• Reading material development

Pros & Cons Analysis

GNU gettext

Pros

• Widely used and well supported
• Integrates well with common programming languages
• Helps produce professional quality translations
• Reduces localization costs by reusing translations
• Open source with active development community

Cons

• Can have a steep learning curve
• Formatting codes in PO files can be confusing
• Not as user friendly as some paid alternatives
• Limited WYSIWYG editor options
• Requires programming knowledge to fully utilize

Graphite (SIL)

Pros

• Free and open source
• User-friendly interface
• Supports minority languages
• Allows collaboration

Cons

• Limited language support
• Steep learning curve
• Requires technical knowledge

Pricing Comparison

GNU gettext

• Open Source

Graphite (SIL)

• Free
• Open Source