Google Cobalt vs NW.js

Struggling to choose between Google Cobalt and NW.js? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Google Cobalt is a Web Browsers solution with tags like opensource, fast, secure, modular, lowmemory.

It boasts features such as Written in Rust for improved security and parallelism, Designed for minimal memory usage, Built-in sandboxing, Supports WebAssembly, Supports modern web standards like CSS Grid and WebGL, Multi-process architecture and pros including Faster page load times, Enhanced security protections, Lower memory footprint, Modular design allows customization, Support for latest web technologies.

On the other hand, NW.js is a Development product tagged with html, css, javascript, nodejs, desktop-apps.

Its standout features include Lets you build desktop apps using web technologies like HTML, CSS and JavaScript, Integrates Node.js into apps allowing access to system resources, Supports creating apps for Windows, macOS and Linux from a single codebase, Uses Chromium and Node.js as runtime environments, Has a small footprint compared to Electron, and it shines with pros like Familiar web development skills can be used, Good performance due to lightweight runtimes, Active open source community support, Integration of Node.js modules provides power and flexibility, Cross-platform support from single codebase.

Feature	Google Cobalt	NW.js
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Web Browsers	Development

Product Overview

Google Cobalt

Description: Google Cobalt is a new open source browser rendering engine developed by Google. It is designed to be faster, more secure, and more modular than previous browsers while using less memory.

NW.js

Description: NW.js (formerly node-webkit) is an open source framework for creating desktop applications with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It enables developers to call Node.js modules directly from the DOM and enables desktop applications to integrate web technologies.

Key Features Comparison

Google Cobalt Features

• Written in Rust for improved security and parallelism
• Designed for minimal memory usage
• Built-in sandboxing
• Supports WebAssembly
• Supports modern web standards like CSS Grid and WebGL
• Multi-process architecture

NW.js Features

• Lets you build desktop apps using web technologies like HTML, CSS and JavaScript
• Integrates Node.js into apps allowing access to system resources
• Supports creating apps for Windows, macOS and Linux from a single codebase
• Uses Chromium and Node.js as runtime environments
• Has a small footprint compared to Electron

Pros & Cons Analysis

Google Cobalt

Pros

• Faster page load times
• Enhanced security protections
• Lower memory footprint
• Modular design allows customization
• Support for latest web technologies

Cons

• Limited browser compatibility currently
• Still in early development stages
• Smaller web community than other engines like Blink or Gecko
• Lacks some features of more mature rendering engines

NW.js

Pros

• Familiar web development skills can be used
• Good performance due to lightweight runtimes
• Active open source community support
• Integration of Node.js modules provides power and flexibility
• Cross-platform support from single codebase

Cons

• Less out-of-box functionality compared to solutions like Electron
• Less active development and momentum than Electron
• More involved to package and distribute apps
• Limited debugging and developer tools support
• Smaller ecosystem of plugins and extensions

Pricing Comparison

Google Cobalt

• Open Source

NW.js

• Open Source