gw.run vs inlets

Struggling to choose between gw.run and inlets? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

gw.run is a Development solution with tags like workflows, automation, opensource.

It boasts features such as Graphical interface for building workflows, Connectors for various data sources and services, Scheduling and monitoring workflows, Version control and collaboration, Open source and self-hosted and pros including Intuitive visual workflow builder, Large library of pre-built components, Active open source community, Self-hosted option for maximum control, Free and open source.

On the other hand, inlets is a Network & Admin product tagged with networking, tunneling, vpn, cloud, security.

Its standout features include Expose internal services on public URLs or domains, Tunnel traffic through a single endpoint server, Use WebSockets for secure communication, No need to open firewall ports, Written in Go programming language, Open source and cloud-native, and it shines with pros like Secure way to expose internal services, Easy to set up and configure, Scalable and highly available, Supports various cloud providers and on-premises environments, Lightweight and efficient.

Feature	gw.run	inlets
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Network & Admin

Product Overview

gw.run

Description: gw.run is an open-source software for running workflows and automating tasks. It allows you to easily create workflows with a graphical interface and connect to various data sources and services.

inlets

Description: Inlets is an open source cloud native tunnel written in Go that can expose internal services on public URLs or domains by tunneling traffic through a single endpoint server. It uses websockets and works well for exposing services securely without opening firewall ports.

Key Features Comparison

gw.run Features

• Graphical interface for building workflows
• Connectors for various data sources and services
• Scheduling and monitoring workflows
• Version control and collaboration
• Open source and self-hosted

inlets Features

• Expose internal services on public URLs or domains
• Tunnel traffic through a single endpoint server
• Use WebSockets for secure communication
• No need to open firewall ports
• Written in Go programming language
• Open source and cloud-native

Pros & Cons Analysis

gw.run

Pros

• Intuitive visual workflow builder
• Large library of pre-built components
• Active open source community
• Self-hosted option for maximum control
• Free and open source

Cons

• Limited integrations compared to commercial products
• Steeper learning curve than some no-code tools
• Not as feature rich as paid options

inlets

Pros

• Secure way to expose internal services
• Easy to set up and configure
• Scalable and highly available
• Supports various cloud providers and on-premises environments
• Lightweight and efficient

Cons

• Requires an external server for the tunnel endpoint
• May introduce additional latency or network overhead
• Limited to WebSocket-based communication

Pricing Comparison

gw.run

• Open Source
• Self-Hosted

inlets

• Open Source