Haraka vs Mail-in-a-box

Struggling to choose between Haraka and Mail-in-a-box? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Haraka is a Network & Admin solution with tags like smtp, nodejs, email, server.

It boasts features such as Built on Node.js for high performance, Plugin architecture for extensibility, Support for multiple platforms, Easy installation and configuration, Built-in spam filtering, TLS and SMTP authentication support, Milter support for integration with external filters, Rate limiting and greylisting capabilities, Header and body filtering, Detailed logging and metrics and pros including High performance and scalability, Easy to install and configure, Extensible through plugins, Active development community, Free and open source.

On the other hand, Mail-in-a-box is a Network & Admin product tagged with email, server, open-source.

Its standout features include Easy to set up and manage email server, Bundled email components like Postfix, Dovecot, SpamAssassin, and OpenDKIM, Supports multiple email accounts and domains, Automatic security updates and backups, Web-based administration interface, Supports IMAP, POP3, and SMTP protocols, Integrated spam and virus protection, Supports SSL/TLS encryption, and it shines with pros like Open-source and free to use, Comprehensive set of email server features, Easy to set up and manage, Automatically handles security updates and backups, Customizable and extensible.

Feature	Haraka	Mail-in-a-box
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Haraka

Description: Haraka is an open source SMTP server written in Node.js. It is designed to be easy to install and configure, while also offering excellent performance and reliability. Haraka aims to provide a secure, flexible, and scalable SMTP solution.

Mail-in-a-box

Description: Mail-in-a-Box is an open source email server that allows you to set up and manage email on your own server or virtual private server. It bundles together common email components like Postfix, Dovecot, SpamAssassin, and OpenDKIM into an easy-to-manage package.

Key Features Comparison

Haraka Features

• Built on Node.js for high performance
• Plugin architecture for extensibility
• Support for multiple platforms
• Easy installation and configuration
• Built-in spam filtering
• TLS and SMTP authentication support
• Milter support for integration with external filters
• Rate limiting and greylisting capabilities
• Header and body filtering
• Detailed logging and metrics

Mail-in-a-box Features

• Easy to set up and manage email server
• Bundled email components like Postfix, Dovecot, SpamAssassin, and OpenDKIM
• Supports multiple email accounts and domains
• Automatic security updates and backups
• Web-based administration interface
• Supports IMAP, POP3, and SMTP protocols
• Integrated spam and virus protection
• Supports SSL/TLS encryption

Pros & Cons Analysis

Haraka

Pros

• High performance and scalability
• Easy to install and configure
• Extensible through plugins
• Active development community
• Free and open source

Cons

• Limited built-in web interface
• Steeper learning curve than some SMTP servers
• Requires more technical expertise to manage
• Not as feature rich as some commercial options

Mail-in-a-box

Pros

• Open-source and free to use
• Comprehensive set of email server features
• Easy to set up and manage
• Automatically handles security updates and backups
• Customizable and extensible

Cons

• Requires a dedicated server or VPS
• Limited support for mobile devices
• May require technical expertise to configure and maintain

Pricing Comparison

Haraka

• Open Source

Mail-in-a-box

• Open Source