Hasura vs PocketBase

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Hasura icon
Hasura
PocketBase icon
PocketBase

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Hasura and PocketBase? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Hasura is a Development solution with tags like graphql, postgres, realtime, apis.

It boasts features such as Instant realtime GraphQL APIs, Works with existing Postgres databases, Built-in authorization & access control, Triggers for business logic, Remote schemas to integrate existing APIs, Fine-grained access control, Works with microservices and pros including Rapid development and prototyping, Realtime capabilities out of the box, No need to write backend code, Integrates with existing databases, Granular access control.

On the other hand, PocketBase is a Development product tagged with opensource, selfhosted, lightweight, realtime-sync.

Its standout features include Realtime data sync, Open API, User management, Access control, File storage, Custom functions, Lightweight and fast, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Easy to set up and use, Realtime sync is great for apps, Lightweight compared to SQL databases, Good for small scale projects.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Hasura and PocketBase?

When evaluating Hasura versus PocketBase, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Hasura and PocketBase have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include graphql, postgres, realtime.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Hasura and PocketBase significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include graphql, postgres, realtime, apis.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include graphql, postgres and opensource, selfhosted.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Hasura and PocketBase. You might also explore graphql, postgres, realtime for alternative approaches.

Feature Hasura PocketBase
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Hasura
Hasura

Description: Hasura is an open source GraphQL engine that provides instant realtime GraphQL APIs on new or existing Postgres databases. It helps developers build modern apps and APIs faster by abstracting away the boilerplate of backend development.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

PocketBase
PocketBase

Description: PocketBase is an open-source, self-hosted database that is easy to set up and manage. It is lightweight, fast, and allows real-time data syncing across devices. Useful for small-scale projects that need simple database functionality.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Hasura
Hasura Features
  • Instant realtime GraphQL APIs
  • Works with existing Postgres databases
  • Built-in authorization & access control
  • Triggers for business logic
  • Remote schemas to integrate existing APIs
  • Fine-grained access control
  • Works with microservices
PocketBase
PocketBase Features
  • Realtime data sync
  • Open API
  • User management
  • Access control
  • File storage
  • Custom functions
  • Lightweight and fast

Pros & Cons Analysis

Hasura
Hasura
Pros
  • Rapid development and prototyping
  • Realtime capabilities out of the box
  • No need to write backend code
  • Integrates with existing databases
  • Granular access control
Cons
  • Can be complex for larger applications
  • Limited flexibility compared to custom backends
  • Steep learning curve for GraphQL
PocketBase
PocketBase
Pros
  • Open source and free
  • Easy to set up and use
  • Realtime sync is great for apps
  • Lightweight compared to SQL databases
  • Good for small scale projects
Cons
  • Not suitable for large scale or complex projects
  • Limited query capabilities compared to SQL
  • Not many advanced database features
  • Lacks extensive documentation

Pricing Comparison

Hasura
Hasura
  • Open Source
  • Freemium
  • Custom Pricing
PocketBase
PocketBase
  • Open Source
  • Freemium

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs