Hazelcast vs CockroachDB

Struggling to choose between Hazelcast and CockroachDB? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Hazelcast is a Development solution with tags like caching, processing-streams, clustering.

It boasts features such as Distributed in-memory data store, Low latency data access, Automatic sharding and rebalancing, ACID transactions, Querying and aggregation, Event journaling, Multi-datacenter replication, Web session clustering, Continuous query, Machine learning and pros including Fast performance, Easy scalability, High availability, Flexible deployment options, Open source, Rich ecosystem.

On the other hand, CockroachDB is a Development product tagged with distributed, scalable, fault-tolerant, sql.

Its standout features include Distributed SQL database, Horizontal scaling, High availability, Fault tolerance, ACID transactions, Multi-datacenter support, SQL compatibility, Automatic replication and failover, Geo-distributed deployments, Automated data balancing, SQL access for applications, and it shines with pros like Scalable and highly available, Consistent and durable data, Automatic failover and recovery, SQL compatibility for easy migration, Open-source and community-driven, Cloud-native architecture.

Feature	Hazelcast	CockroachDB
Overall Score	N/A	1
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Hazelcast

Description: Hazelcast is an open source in-memory data grid that enables distribution of data and computation across servers for scalability, speed, and resilience. It is commonly used for caching, processing streams, and clustering.

CockroachDB

Description: CockroachDB is an open-source, distributed SQL database that scales horizontally with high availability to tolerate failures and supports strongly consistent ACID transactions. It aims to provide scalability, survivability, and data consistency across multiple datacenters.

Key Features Comparison

Hazelcast Features

• Distributed in-memory data store
• Low latency data access
• Automatic sharding and rebalancing
• ACID transactions
• Querying and aggregation
• Event journaling
• Multi-datacenter replication
• Web session clustering
• Continuous query
• Machine learning

CockroachDB Features

• Distributed SQL database
• Horizontal scaling
• High availability
• Fault tolerance
• ACID transactions
• Multi-datacenter support
• SQL compatibility
• Automatic replication and failover
• Geo-distributed deployments
• Automated data balancing
• SQL access for applications

Pros & Cons Analysis

Hazelcast

Pros

• Fast performance
• Easy scalability
• High availability
• Flexible deployment options
• Open source
• Rich ecosystem

Cons

• Complex configuration
• Steep learning curve
• No visual interface

CockroachDB

Pros

• Scalable and highly available
• Consistent and durable data
• Automatic failover and recovery
• SQL compatibility for easy migration
• Open-source and community-driven
• Cloud-native architecture

Cons

• Complexity of managing a distributed system
• Limited ecosystem and tooling compared to traditional databases
• Higher hardware requirements for production deployments
• Potential performance overhead due to distributed nature

Pricing Comparison

Hazelcast

• Open Source
• Enterprise Edition (Subscription)

CockroachDB

• Open Source