Hazelcast vs OrbitDB

Struggling to choose between Hazelcast and OrbitDB? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Hazelcast is a Development solution with tags like caching, processing-streams, clustering.

It boasts features such as Distributed in-memory data store, Low latency data access, Automatic sharding and rebalancing, ACID transactions, Querying and aggregation, Event journaling, Multi-datacenter replication, Web session clustering, Continuous query, Machine learning and pros including Fast performance, Easy scalability, High availability, Flexible deployment options, Open source, Rich ecosystem.

On the other hand, OrbitDB is a Development product tagged with decentralized, peertopeer, ipfs, distributed-web.

Its standout features include Decentralized database, Built on IPFS, Event log for database changes, Supports CRUD operations, Access control lists, Queryable database API, and it shines with pros like Decentralization provides censorship resistance, Data is distributed across nodes, Immutable append-only log, Fine-grained access control, Interoperable with other IPFS tools.

Feature	Hazelcast	OrbitDB
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Hazelcast

Description: Hazelcast is an open source in-memory data grid that enables distribution of data and computation across servers for scalability, speed, and resilience. It is commonly used for caching, processing streams, and clustering.

OrbitDB

Description: OrbitDB is a decentralized peer-to-peer database that allows developers to build decentralized applications. It works on top of IPFS, providing an API for managing databases on the distributed web.

Key Features Comparison

Hazelcast Features

• Distributed in-memory data store
• Low latency data access
• Automatic sharding and rebalancing
• ACID transactions
• Querying and aggregation
• Event journaling
• Multi-datacenter replication
• Web session clustering
• Continuous query
• Machine learning

OrbitDB Features

• Decentralized database
• Built on IPFS
• Event log for database changes
• Supports CRUD operations
• Access control lists
• Queryable database API

Pros & Cons Analysis

Hazelcast

Pros

• Fast performance
• Easy scalability
• High availability
• Flexible deployment options
• Open source
• Rich ecosystem

Cons

• Complex configuration
• Steep learning curve
• No visual interface

OrbitDB

Pros

• Decentralization provides censorship resistance
• Data is distributed across nodes
• Immutable append-only log
• Fine-grained access control
• Interoperable with other IPFS tools

Cons

• Still in early development
• Limited query capabilities
• Performance limitations of IPFS
• No built-in indexing or relationships

Pricing Comparison

Hazelcast

• Open Source
• Enterprise Edition (Subscription)

OrbitDB

• Open Source