Heroku vs Kubero

Struggling to choose between Heroku and Kubero? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Heroku is a Online Services solution with tags like paas, cloud-computing, application-deployment.

It boasts features such as Cloud platform as a service, Simplifies deployment, management and scaling, Supports popular languages like Ruby, Java, Node.js, Scala, Clojure, Python and PHP, Add-ons provide additional services like databases, monitoring, logging, etc, Git-based workflow for deploying code changes, Free starter tier available and pros including Easy and fast deployment, Automatic scaling, Focus on writing code without infrastructure management, Reliable and secure platform, Integrates with other Salesforce products, Large ecosystem of add-ons.

On the other hand, Kubero is a Network & Admin product tagged with kubernetes, container, orchestration, opensource.

Its standout features include Graphical user interface for managing Kubernetes clusters, Cluster management - create, edit, upgrade and delete clusters, Resource management - deploy, monitor and manage Kubernetes resources, RBAC management - create users, roles and role bindings, Helm chart management - deploy and manage applications via Helm, Audit logging - view all user and system actions, Multi-cluster management - manage multiple clusters from a single UI, and it shines with pros like Intuitive dashboard simplifies Kubernetes management, No need to use command line for common tasks, Role-based access control for managing user permissions, Support for multiple cloud providers and on-prem clusters, Active community and frequent updates.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud platform as a service (PaaS) that simplifies application deployment, management, and scaling. Acquired by Salesforce, Heroku allows developers to focus on writing code by providing an easy-to-use platform for building, deploying, and scaling applications without the need for complex infrastructure management.

Categories:
paas cloud-computing application-deployment

Heroku Features

  1. Cloud platform as a service
  2. Simplifies deployment, management and scaling
  3. Supports popular languages like Ruby, Java, Node.js, Scala, Clojure, Python and PHP
  4. Add-ons provide additional services like databases, monitoring, logging, etc
  5. Git-based workflow for deploying code changes
  6. Free starter tier available

Pricing

  • Free
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Easy and fast deployment

Automatic scaling

Focus on writing code without infrastructure management

Reliable and secure platform

Integrates with other Salesforce products

Large ecosystem of add-ons

Cons

Can get expensive for large scale applications

Limited control compared to IaaS

Vendor lock-in

Config changes require redeploy

Not ideal for complex applications


Kubero

Kubero

Kubero is an open-source Kubernetes management platform that provides a user-friendly GUI to manage Kubernetes clusters, resources, users, roles and more. It simplifies Kubernetes with an intuitive dashboard for visibility and control.

Categories:
kubernetes container orchestration opensource

Kubero Features

  1. Graphical user interface for managing Kubernetes clusters
  2. Cluster management - create, edit, upgrade and delete clusters
  3. Resource management - deploy, monitor and manage Kubernetes resources
  4. RBAC management - create users, roles and role bindings
  5. Helm chart management - deploy and manage applications via Helm
  6. Audit logging - view all user and system actions
  7. Multi-cluster management - manage multiple clusters from a single UI

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Intuitive dashboard simplifies Kubernetes management

No need to use command line for common tasks

Role-based access control for managing user permissions

Support for multiple cloud providers and on-prem clusters

Active community and frequent updates

Cons

Less flexibility than using kubectl directly

Limited metrics and monitoring capabilities

No official enterprise support offered

Less mature than some commercial alternatives