Holepunch vs inlets

Struggling to choose between Holepunch and inlets? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Holepunch is a Remote Work & Education solution with tags like opensource, video-conferencing, screen-sharing, chat, collaboration.

It boasts features such as Video conferencing, Screen sharing, Chat, Remote collaboration and pros including Free and open source, No vendor lock-in, Customizable and extensible.

On the other hand, inlets is a Network & Admin product tagged with networking, tunneling, vpn, cloud, security.

Its standout features include Expose internal services on public URLs or domains, Tunnel traffic through a single endpoint server, Use WebSockets for secure communication, No need to open firewall ports, Written in Go programming language, Open source and cloud-native, and it shines with pros like Secure way to expose internal services, Easy to set up and configure, Scalable and highly available, Supports various cloud providers and on-premises environments, Lightweight and efficient.

Feature	Holepunch	inlets
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Remote Work & Education	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Holepunch

Description: Holepunch is an open-source alternative to online meeting and web conferencing software like Zoom or Webex. It allows for video conferencing, screen sharing, chat, and other collaboration features for teams to meet and work together remotely.

inlets

Description: Inlets is an open source cloud native tunnel written in Go that can expose internal services on public URLs or domains by tunneling traffic through a single endpoint server. It uses websockets and works well for exposing services securely without opening firewall ports.

Key Features Comparison

Holepunch Features

• Video conferencing
• Screen sharing
• Chat
• Remote collaboration

inlets Features

• Expose internal services on public URLs or domains
• Tunnel traffic through a single endpoint server
• Use WebSockets for secure communication
• No need to open firewall ports
• Written in Go programming language
• Open source and cloud-native

Pros & Cons Analysis

Holepunch

Pros

• Free and open source
• No vendor lock-in
• Customizable and extensible

Cons

• Limited features compared to paid options
• May require more technical expertise
• Smaller user base

inlets

Pros

• Secure way to expose internal services
• Easy to set up and configure
• Scalable and highly available
• Supports various cloud providers and on-premises environments
• Lightweight and efficient

Cons

• Requires an external server for the tunnel endpoint
• May introduce additional latency or network overhead
• Limited to WebSocket-based communication

Pricing Comparison

Holepunch

• Open Source

inlets

• Open Source