Invicti (Netsparker) vs w3af

Struggling to choose between Invicti (Netsparker) and w3af? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Invicti (Netsparker) is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like web-security, vulnerability-scanner, web-app-scanner, sql-injection, xss, security-testing.

It boasts features such as Crawls entire websites and APIs to find vulnerabilities, Scans JavaScript files and APIs, Prioritizes high and critical risk vulnerabilities, Integrates with CI/CD pipelines, Provides proof-of-concept and remediation guidance, Has plugin support for IDEs and build tools and pros including Very accurate and low false positive rate, Easy to use interface and configuration, Detailed vulnerability reports, Flexible authentication configuration, Integrates seamlessly into DevOps workflows, Good customer support.

On the other hand, w3af is a Security & Privacy product tagged with web-application, security, vulnerability-scanner, xss, sqli, rce.

Its standout features include Fully automated vulnerability scanner, Over 200 web vulnerabilities detected, Plugin architecture for extensibility, Identifies vulnerabilities like XSS, SQLi, RCE, Flexible configuration of scans, Command line and GUI interfaces, Integrations with CI/CD pipelines, Powerful exploitation framework, Detailed vulnerability reporting, Supports authentication for protected apps, Distributed scanning capabilities, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Highly extensible and customizable, Easy to use interface, Powerful detection capabilities, Detailed reporting, Active development and community support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Invicti (Netsparker)

Invicti (Netsparker)

Invicti (Netsparker) is a web application security scanner that helps identify vulnerabilities in web apps and APIs. It can automatically crawl web applications, analyze the code, and detect SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and other vulnerabilities. Invicti is easy to use and provides detailed vulnerability reports.

Categories:
web-security vulnerability-scanner web-app-scanner sql-injection xss security-testing

Invicti (Netsparker) Features

  1. Crawls entire websites and APIs to find vulnerabilities
  2. Scans JavaScript files and APIs
  3. Prioritizes high and critical risk vulnerabilities
  4. Integrates with CI/CD pipelines
  5. Provides proof-of-concept and remediation guidance
  6. Has plugin support for IDEs and build tools

Pricing

  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Very accurate and low false positive rate

Easy to use interface and configuration

Detailed vulnerability reports

Flexible authentication configuration

Integrates seamlessly into DevOps workflows

Good customer support

Cons

Can be resource intensive for large apps

Lacks custom authentication modules

Compliance reporting needs improvement

Limited integrations compared to competitors


w3af

w3af

w3af is an open source web application security scanner. It helps developers and security researchers identify and exploit vulnerabilities in web apps. w3af is designed to find XSS, SQLi, RCE, and other common web app vulnerabilities.

Categories:
web-application security vulnerability-scanner xss sqli rce

W3af Features

  1. Fully automated vulnerability scanner
  2. Over 200 web vulnerabilities detected
  3. Plugin architecture for extensibility
  4. Identifies vulnerabilities like XSS, SQLi, RCE
  5. Flexible configuration of scans
  6. Command line and GUI interfaces
  7. Integrations with CI/CD pipelines
  8. Powerful exploitation framework
  9. Detailed vulnerability reporting
  10. Supports authentication for protected apps
  11. Distributed scanning capabilities

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

Highly extensible and customizable

Easy to use interface

Powerful detection capabilities

Detailed reporting

Active development and community support

Cons

Can be resource intensive for large scans

Steep learning curve for advanced features

Prone to false positives if not tuned properly

Limited scalability compared to commercial tools