iTerm2 vs Stjerm

Struggling to choose between iTerm2 and Stjerm? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

iTerm2 is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like terminal, emulator, macos, opensource.

It boasts features such as Split panes, Search, Autocorrect, Mouseless copy/paste, Profiles and themes and pros including More features than built-in Terminal, Open source, Customizable and extensible.

On the other hand, Stjerm is a Os & Utilities product tagged with tiling, keyboarddriven, minimalist, opensource.

Its standout features include Tiling window manager, Keyboard-driven interface, Automatic window arrangement, Minimalist design, Customizable layouts and shortcuts, and it shines with pros like Efficient use of screen space, Keyboard shortcuts for navigation, Low resource usage, Highly customizable, Active open source community.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

iTerm2

iTerm2

iTerm2 is a popular open-source terminal emulator for macOS. It has more features than the built-in Terminal app, like split panes, search, autocorrect, mouseless copy/paste, profiles and themes, and more.

Categories:
terminal emulator macos opensource

ITerm2 Features

  1. Split panes
  2. Search
  3. Autocorrect
  4. Mouseless copy/paste
  5. Profiles and themes

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

More features than built-in Terminal

Open source

Customizable and extensible

Cons

Steeper learning curve than Terminal

More resource intensive

Less stable than Terminal


Stjerm

Stjerm

Stjerm is a free and open-source tiling window manager for X11. It provides a minimalist, keyboard-driven user interface where windows are arranged automatically to use screen space efficiently.

Categories:
tiling keyboarddriven minimalist opensource

Stjerm Features

  1. Tiling window manager
  2. Keyboard-driven interface
  3. Automatic window arrangement
  4. Minimalist design
  5. Customizable layouts and shortcuts

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free

Pros

Efficient use of screen space

Keyboard shortcuts for navigation

Low resource usage

Highly customizable

Active open source community

Cons

Steep learning curve

Manual configuration required

Less flexibility than floating WMs

Limited integration with desktop environments