Keycloak vs Hanko

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Keycloak icon
Keycloak
Hanko icon
Hanko

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Keycloak and Hanko? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Keycloak is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like authentication, authorization, user-management, open-source.

It boasts features such as Single sign-on, Identity brokering and social login, User federation, Client adapters, Admin console and pros including Open source, Easy integration, Flexible and customizable, Robust access management capabilities.

On the other hand, Hanko is a Office & Productivity product tagged with esignature, pdf, document-management.

Its standout features include Digital signature workflow, Bulk sending of documents, Customizable email templates, Audit trail, Tamper-evident seals, Multi-factor authentication, Document templates, API access, White labeling, Role-based access control, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Integrates with popular DMS, Customizable and extensible, Secure digital signatures, Bulk sending capabilities, Audit trail for compliance, Multi-factor authentication.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Keycloak and Hanko?

When evaluating Keycloak versus Hanko, both solutions serve different needs within the security & privacy ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Keycloak and Hanko have established themselves in the security & privacy market. Key areas include authentication, authorization, user-management.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Keycloak and Hanko significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include authentication, authorization, user-management, open-source.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include authentication, authorization and esignature, pdf.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Keycloak and Hanko. You might also explore authentication, authorization, user-management for alternative approaches.

Feature Keycloak Hanko
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Security & Privacy Office & Productivity
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Keycloak
Keycloak

Description: Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution. It handles authentication, authorization, and user federation and makes it easy to secure applications and services. Keycloak provides out-of-the-box support for popular protocols like OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0, and SAML 2.0.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Hanko
Hanko

Description: Hanko is an open-source eSignature solution that allows users to securely sign PDF documents. It integrates with popular document management systems to streamline workflows requiring signatures.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Keycloak
Keycloak Features
  • Single sign-on
  • Identity brokering and social login
  • User federation
  • Client adapters
  • Admin console
Hanko
Hanko Features
  • Digital signature workflow
  • Bulk sending of documents
  • Customizable email templates
  • Audit trail
  • Tamper-evident seals
  • Multi-factor authentication
  • Document templates
  • API access
  • White labeling
  • Role-based access control

Pros & Cons Analysis

Keycloak
Keycloak
Pros
  • Open source
  • Easy integration
  • Flexible and customizable
  • Robust access management capabilities
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Complex configuration
  • Limited native reporting capabilities
Hanko
Hanko
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Integrates with popular DMS
  • Customizable and extensible
  • Secure digital signatures
  • Bulk sending capabilities
  • Audit trail for compliance
  • Multi-factor authentication
Cons
  • Limited native mobile apps
  • Steep learning curve
  • Requires self-hosting
  • Limited native integrations

Pricing Comparison

Keycloak
Keycloak
  • Open Source
Hanko
Hanko
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Keycloak
Keycloak
Keycloak
Learn More About Keycloak
Hanko
Hanko
Hanko
Learn More About Hanko

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Alternatives, made obvious.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal