Mergify vs Bitbucket

Struggling to choose between Mergify and Bitbucket? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Mergify is a Development solution with tags like github, automation, pull-requests.

It boasts features such as Automated merging, closing, labeling and assigning of pull requests based on rules, Support for GitHub Actions and branch protection rules, Web interface to view and manage pull requests, Notifications through various channels like email, Slack etc, Integration with services like Travis CI, CircleCI, AppVeyor etc, Caching of pull requests to optimize performance, Support for GitHub Enterprise installations, Webhook support for external triggers and pros including Saves time by automating repetitive pull request tasks, Improves team workflow and collaboration, Increases visibility into status of pull requests, Easy to set up and get started, Flexible rules system to customize automation, Free for open source projects.

On the other hand, Bitbucket is a Development product tagged with git, mercurial, repository, version-control.

Its standout features include Git and Mercurial version control, Pull requests for code review, Issue tracking, Code search, Wikis for documentation, Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc, and it shines with pros like Unlimited private repositories for small teams, Great integration with other Atlassian products, Powerful branch permissions and workflows, Fast and reliable performance.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Mergify

Mergify

Mergify is an automation tool for managing pull requests on GitHub. It allows you to define rules to automatically merge, close, label, or assign pull requests based on conditions.

Categories:
github automation pull-requests

Mergify Features

  1. Automated merging, closing, labeling and assigning of pull requests based on rules
  2. Support for GitHub Actions and branch protection rules
  3. Web interface to view and manage pull requests
  4. Notifications through various channels like email, Slack etc
  5. Integration with services like Travis CI, CircleCI, AppVeyor etc
  6. Caching of pull requests to optimize performance
  7. Support for GitHub Enterprise installations
  8. Webhook support for external triggers

Pricing

  • Free
  • Freemium
  • Open Source

Pros

Saves time by automating repetitive pull request tasks

Improves team workflow and collaboration

Increases visibility into status of pull requests

Easy to set up and get started

Flexible rules system to customize automation

Free for open source projects

Cons

Can only be used for projects hosted on GitHub

Rules can be complex to configure for advanced workflows

No native mobile apps, only web interface

Potential for incorrectly configured rules to cause problems

Limited customization compared to self-hosted solutions


Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service owned by Atlassian that allows teams to collaborate on code. It provides tools to manage Git and Mercurial repositories, issue tracking, wikis, and more for teams of any size.

Categories:
git mercurial repository version-control

Bitbucket Features

  1. Git and Mercurial version control
  2. Pull requests for code review
  3. Issue tracking
  4. Code search
  5. Wikis for documentation
  6. Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc

Pricing

  • Free
  • Standard ($3-10 per user/month)
  • Premium ($6-21 per user/month)

Pros

Unlimited private repositories for small teams

Great integration with other Atlassian products

Powerful branch permissions and workflows

Fast and reliable performance

Cons

Less repository storage than GitHub for free plan

Missing some features of GitHub like social coding

Web interface not as polished as GitHub