Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing vs Cerberus Testing

Struggling to choose between Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing and Cerberus Testing? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a Development solution with tags like functional-testing, web-application-testing, mobile-application-testing, test-automation.

It boasts features such as GUI-based test creation, Cross-browser testing, Mobile app testing, API testing, Integrations with CI/CD tools, Scriptless test authoring, Object recognition, Test debugging and pros including Supports multiple protocols and environments, Reusable test components, Headless testing, Parallel test execution, Detailed reporting, Open architecture and extensibility.

On the other hand, Cerberus Testing is a Development product tagged with open-source, automated-testing, android, mobile-apps, validation, ui-testing.

Its standout features include Automated UI testing, Automated accessibility testing, Support for Espresso and UIAutomator, Parallel test execution, Test orchestration, Test reporting, and it shines with pros like Open source, Easy to set up and use, Good documentation, Active community support, Supports multiple test frameworks, Parallel test execution improves speed.

Feature	Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing	Cerberus Testing
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Description: Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a software testing tool used for functional, regression, and performance testing of web and mobile applications. It supports a range of protocols and allows for automated test creation and execution.

Cerberus Testing

Description: Cerberus Testing is an open source automated testing suite for Android applications. It provides a set of tools to write automated tests to validate the functionality and UI of Android apps.

Key Features Comparison

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing Features

• GUI-based test creation
• Cross-browser testing
• Mobile app testing
• API testing
• Integrations with CI/CD tools
• Scriptless test authoring
• Object recognition
• Test debugging

Cerberus Testing Features

• Automated UI testing
• Automated accessibility testing
• Support for Espresso and UIAutomator
• Parallel test execution
• Test orchestration
• Test reporting

Pros & Cons Analysis

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Pros

• Supports multiple protocols and environments
• Reusable test components
• Headless testing
• Parallel test execution
• Detailed reporting
• Open architecture and extensibility

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Expensive licensing
• Script maintenance can be challenging
• Limited support for some modern web technologies

Cerberus Testing

Pros

• Open source
• Easy to set up and use
• Good documentation
• Active community support
• Supports multiple test frameworks
• Parallel test execution improves speed

Cons

• Limited built-in assertions
• No native support for iOS testing
• Steep learning curve for advanced features
• Can be difficult to debug failures

Pricing Comparison

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go

Cerberus Testing

• Open Source