Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing vs ZAPTEST

Struggling to choose between Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing and ZAPTEST? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a Development solution with tags like functional-testing, web-application-testing, mobile-application-testing, test-automation.

It boasts features such as GUI-based test creation, Cross-browser testing, Mobile app testing, API testing, Integrations with CI/CD tools, Scriptless test authoring, Object recognition, Test debugging and pros including Supports multiple protocols and environments, Reusable test components, Headless testing, Parallel test execution, Detailed reporting, Open architecture and extensibility.

On the other hand, ZAPTEST is a Security & Privacy product tagged with opensource, web-application-security, vulnerability-scanning, sql-injection, crosssite-scripting.

Its standout features include Automated vulnerability scanning, Manual testing through proxies, Spidering and crawling, Passive scanning, Forced browsing, Fuzzing, Attack scripts, Integrations with CI/CD pipelines, APIs for automation, Extensible via add-ons, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to use, Comprehensive feature set, Active community support, Cross-platform, Integrates with many tools, Extensible and customizable.

Feature	Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing	ZAPTEST
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Security & Privacy

Product Overview

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Description: Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a software testing tool used for functional, regression, and performance testing of web and mobile applications. It supports a range of protocols and allows for automated test creation and execution.

ZAPTEST

Description: ZAPTEST is an open-source web application security testing tool that helps developers and security analysts identify vulnerabilities in their web applications. It provides automated scanning of sites to detect common vulnerabilities like SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and insecure configurations.

Key Features Comparison

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing Features

• GUI-based test creation
• Cross-browser testing
• Mobile app testing
• API testing
• Integrations with CI/CD tools
• Scriptless test authoring
• Object recognition
• Test debugging

ZAPTEST Features

• Automated vulnerability scanning
• Manual testing through proxies
• Spidering and crawling
• Passive scanning
• Forced browsing
• Fuzzing
• Attack scripts
• Integrations with CI/CD pipelines
• APIs for automation
• Extensible via add-ons

Pros & Cons Analysis

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Pros

• Supports multiple protocols and environments
• Reusable test components
• Headless testing
• Parallel test execution
• Detailed reporting
• Open architecture and extensibility

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Expensive licensing
• Script maintenance can be challenging
• Limited support for some modern web technologies

ZAPTEST

Pros

• Free and open source
• Easy to use
• Comprehensive feature set
• Active community support
• Cross-platform
• Integrates with many tools
• Extensible and customizable

Cons

• Can be resource intensive
• Steep learning curve
• Prone to false positives
• Limited default policies
• Not ideal for black box testing

Pricing Comparison

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go

ZAPTEST

• Open Source