Microsoft Active Directory vs 389 Directory Server

Struggling to choose between Microsoft Active Directory and 389 Directory Server? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Microsoft Active Directory is a Network & Admin solution with tags like identity-management, access-control, authentication, authorization, security, microsoft.

It boasts features such as Centralized network administration, Fine-grained access control, Group Policy management, Kerberos-based authentication, LDAP integration, Single sign-on, Hierarchical data storage and pros including Improved security, Easier user/resource management, Role-based access control, Centralized configuration, Simplified authentication.

On the other hand, 389 Directory Server is a Network & Admin product tagged with ldap, directory, server, replication, security.

Its standout features include LDAP server, Multi-master replication, Access control policies, Password policies, Account lockout, Logging and monitoring, CLI and web-based admin tools, Integration with SSSD and IPA, Schema management, Database backends like LMDB and Berkeley DB, and it shines with pros like Open source, Enterprise-grade performance and scalability, Robust access control and security features, Multi-master replication for high availability, Wide protocol support (LDAP, LDAPI, StartTLS, etc), Backward compatible with Fedora Directory Server.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.